Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34081281›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2021

Examining the asymmetric socioeconomic determinants of CO2 emissions in China: challenges and policy implications.

Yexing Yin, Xinruo Xiong, Sana Ullah, Sidra Sohail

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
10.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The asymmetric effect of technology shocks on CO2 emissions: a panel analysis of BRICS economies.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2022
    Article
  4. Measuring economic, social and environmental wellbeing of Asian economies.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2022
    Article
  5. Caring for the environment: how CO2 emissions respond to human capital in BRICS economies?Environmental science and pollution research international · 2022
    Article
  6. Does financial inclusion and education limit CO2 emissions in China? A new perspective.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Yexing YinSouthwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu, 611130, Sichuan, China. yinyx@smail.swufe.edu.cn.
Xinruo XiongSichuan Normal University, Chengdu, 610066, Sichuan, China.
Sana UllahQuaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Sidra SohailPakistan Institute of Development Economics (PIDE), Islamabad, Pakistan. sidrasohail_14@pide.edu.pk.
Pakistan Institute of Development Economics · PKQuaid-i-Azam University · PKSichuan Normal University · CNSouthwestern University of Finance and Economics · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A better socioeconomic development is necessary for environmental sustainability. The current study scrutinizes the asymmetric socioeconomic factors of CO2 emissions in China by using the nonlinear ARDL approach. This study is based on annual data covering the period from 1980 to 2019. Results show that positive change in economic growth is the leading driver of CO2 growth, while a negative change in economic growth is offsetting CO2 emissions in China. Concurrently, positive and negative changes in energy consumption have adverse impacts on CO2 emissions in the long term, while negative shock has a small influence on CO2 emissions compared to the positive shock of energy. Positive years of schooling, shocks are found to be beneficial for fighting against CO2 emissions in China in the long run. The CO2 emissions are asymmetrically affected by the social and economic structure of China. Based on these empirical findings, thereby China should improve its socioeconomic development and standards of CO2 emissions.

Indexed as

Carbon DioxideEconomic DevelopmentChinaPolicySocioeconomic FactorsCarbon DioxideChinaCO2 emissionsSocioeconomic

Identifiers

PMID34081281
OpenAlexW3165486169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.