ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2021
Modeling of aquifer vulnerability index using deep learning neural networks coupling with optimization algorithms.
Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- Deep learning framework for mapping nitrate pollution in coastal aquifers under land use pressure.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Predicting Water Saturation in a Greek Oilfield with the Power of Artificial Neural Networks.ACS omega · 2025Article
- Hydro-chemical based assessment of groundwater vulnerability in the Holocene multi-aquifers of Ganges delta.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- New DRASTIC framework for groundwater vulnerability assessment: bivariate and multi-criteria decision-making approach coupled with metaheuristic algorithm.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
A reliable assessment of the aquifer contamination vulnerability is essential for the conservation and management of groundwater resources. In this study, a recent technique in artificial intelligence modeling and computational optimization algorithms have been adopted to enhance the groundwater contamination vulnerability assessment. The original DRASTIC model (ODM) suffers from the inherited subjectivity and a lack of robustness to assess the final aquifer vulnerability to nitrate contamination. To overcome the drawbacks of the ODM, and to maximize the accuracy of the final contamination vulnerability index, two levels of modeling strategy were proposed. The first modeling strategy used particle swarm optimization (PSO) and differential evolution (DE) algorithms to determine the effective weights of DRASTIC parameters and to produce new indices of ODVI-PSO and ODVI-DE based on the ODM formula. For strategy-2, a deep learning neural networks (DLNN) model used two indices resulting from strategy-1 as the input data. The adjusted vulnerability index in strategy-2 using the DLNN model showed more superior performance compared to the other index models when it was validated for nitrate values. Study results affirmed the capability of the DLNN model in strategy-2 to extract the further information from ODVI-PSO and ODVI-DE indices. This research concluded that strategy-2 provided higher accuracy for modeling the aquifer contamination vulnerability in the study area and established the efficient applicability for the aquifer contamination vulnerability modeling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.