SynthesisJournal of cardiovascular translational research2022
Predictors of Mortality in Patients Treated with Veno-Arterial ECMO for Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of cardiovascular translational research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Do patients receiving extracorporeal membrane-oxygenation need antibiotic prophylaxis? A systematic review and meta-analysis on 7,996 patients.BMC anesthesiology · 2024Pooled it
- Outcomes and risk factors of transported patients with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: An ECMO center experience.Journal of intensive medicine · 2025Article
- Mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock: microaxial flow pumps for all and VA-ECMO consigned to the museum?Critical care (London, England) · 2024Article
- ECMO in Myocardial Infarction-Associated Cardiogenic Shock: Blood Biomarkers as Predictors of Mortality.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.Respiratory care · 2023Review
- Cardiogenic shock severity and mortality in patients receiving venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenator support.European heart journal. Acute cardiovascular care · 2022Article
- Effect of sex on the association between arterial partial pressure of oxygen and in-hospital mortality in ICU patients with cardiogenic shock: a retrospective cohort study.Annals of translational medicine · 2022Article
- ECMO in Cardiogenic Shock: Time Course of Blood Biomarkers and Associated Mortality.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- ECMO Support in Refractory Cardiogenic Shock: Risk Factors for Mortality.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Describing and Classifying Shock: Recent Insights.US cardiology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMortality for patients on veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) for cardiogenic shock (CS) complicating acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains high. This meta-analysis aims to identify factors that predict higher risk of mortality after VA-ECMO for AMI.
methodsWe meta-analyzed mortality after VA-ECMO for CS complicating AMI and the effect of factors from systematically selected studies published after 2009.
results72 studies (10,276 patients) were included with a pooled mortality estimate of 58 %. With high confidence in estimates, failure to achieve TIMI III flow and left main culprit were identified as factors associated with higher mortality. With low-moderate confidence, older age, high BMI, renal dysfunction, increasing lactate, prothrombin activity < 50%, VA-ECMO implantation after revascularization, and non-shockable ventricular arrythmias were identified as factors associated with mortality.
conclusionThese results provide clinicians with a framework for selecting patients for VA-ECMO for CS complicating AMI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.