Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34081249›Full record

ArticleDigestive diseases and sciences2022

Success and Safety of Needle Knife Papillotomy and Fistulotomy Based on Papillary Anatomy: A Prospective Controlled Trial.

Qi-Sheng Zhang, Jian-Hua Xu, Zhi-Qi Dong, Peng Gao, Yu-Cui Shen

Abstract readControlled Clinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Qi-Sheng ZhangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shanghai Fourth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, 1279 Sanmen Road, Shanghai, 200434, China. zhangqish@hotmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-3291-0127
Jian-Hua XuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shanghai Fourth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, 1279 Sanmen Road, Shanghai, 200434, China.
Zhi-Qi DongDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shanghai Fourth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, 1279 Sanmen Road, Shanghai, 200434, China.
Peng GaoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shanghai Fourth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, 1279 Sanmen Road, Shanghai, 200434, China.
Yu-Cui ShenDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shanghai Fourth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, 1279 Sanmen Road, Shanghai, 200434, China.
Tongji University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeedle knife papillotomy (NKP) and fistulotomy (NKF) are the two most commonly used rescue techniques for patients with difficult biliary cannulation (DBC). Anatomy of the major duodenal papillae (MDP) influences the optimal precut technique for biliary access. However, comparative studies of the success and safety of NKP and NKF based on the anatomy of MDP have been scarce.

methodsPatients with intact MDPs for therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography (ERCP) in our center were enrolled. Early needle knife precuts were uniformly applied to patients with DBC. Difficult MDPs were classified into one of five types based on their endoscopic anatomy. Each type of MDP was allocated to NKP or NKF treatment. Patients with types 1 and 2 papillae always received NKF, 3 and 4 received NKP, and 5 could receive either. The safety and efficacy were analyzed between NKP and NKF, and among different types of MDPs.

resultsA total of 188 out of 1674 patients undergoing ERCP satisfied the criteria for early precutting: 75 patients were assigned to the NKP group and 113 to the NKF group. The total initial success rate of biliary cannulation (ISRBC) of the precut techniques (both NKP and NKF) for patients with DBC was 91.5%. The ISRBC of patients of the NKP group was similar to that of the NKF group (90.7% vs 92.0%, P > 0.05). The ISRBC of the patients in the swollen MDP subgroup (96.1%) was higher than that of patients in the distorted MDP subgroup (81.8%, P = 0.030). The total and specific complications of the patients of the NKP group were similar to those of the NKF group (P > 0.05).

conclusionsNKP and NKF, as selected on the basis of MDP anatomy, are equally safe and highly efficient for patients with DBC to allow biliary cannulation. Patients with swollen MDPs had a higher ISRBC than patients with distorted MDPs. Selecting a precut method based on MDP anatomy is an effective and safe strategy for patients with DBC.

Indexed as

Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic RetrogradeSphincterotomy, EndoscopicCatheterizationHumansProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeComplicationsInitial success rate of biliary cannulationNeedle knife fistulotomyNeedle knife precut papillotomy

Identifiers

PMID34081249
OpenAlexW3165057692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.