Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34081234›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of bipolar disorders2021

Patients' adherence to smartphone apps in the management of bipolar disorder: a systematic review.

Marie-Camille Patoz, Diego Hidalgo-Mazzei, Bruno Pereira, Olivier Blanc, Ingrid de Chazeron, Andrea Murru, Norma Verdolini, Isabella Pacchiarotti, Eduard Vieta, Pierre-Michel Llorca and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of bipolar disorders, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Marie-Camille PatozDepartment of Psychiatry, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, University of Clermont Auvergne, CNRS, Clermont Auvergne INP, Institut Pascal, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Diego Hidalgo-MazzeiBipolar and Depression Disorders Unit, Institute of Neuroscience, Hospital Clinic, CIBERSAM, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
Bruno PereiraDepartment of Psychiatry, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, University of Clermont Auvergne, CNRS, Clermont Auvergne INP, Institut Pascal, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Olivier BlancDepartment of Psychiatry, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, University of Clermont Auvergne, CNRS, Clermont Auvergne INP, Institut Pascal, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Ingrid de ChazeronDepartment of Psychiatry, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, University of Clermont Auvergne, CNRS, Clermont Auvergne INP, Institut Pascal, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Andrea MurruBipolar and Depression Disorders Unit, Institute of Neuroscience, Hospital Clinic, CIBERSAM, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
Norma VerdoliniBipolar and Depression Disorders Unit, Institute of Neuroscience, Hospital Clinic, CIBERSAM, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
Isabella PacchiarottiBipolar and Depression Disorders Unit, Institute of Neuroscience, Hospital Clinic, CIBERSAM, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
Eduard VietaBipolar and Depression Disorders Unit, Institute of Neuroscience, Hospital Clinic, CIBERSAM, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
Pierre-Michel LlorcaDepartment of Psychiatry, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, University of Clermont Auvergne, CNRS, Clermont Auvergne INP, Institut Pascal, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Ludovic SamalinDepartment of Psychiatry, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, University of Clermont Auvergne, CNRS, Clermont Auvergne INP, Institut Pascal, Clermont-Ferrand, France. lsamalin@chu-clermontferrand.fr.

Funding

Ministère des Affaires Sociales, de la Santé et des Droits des Femmes PREPS 17-0121
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite an increasing number of available mental health apps in the bipolar disorder field, these tools remain scarcely implemented in everyday practice and are quickly discontinued by patients after downloading. The aim of this study is to explore adherence characteristics of bipolar disorder patients to dedicated smartphone interventions in research studies.

methodsA systematic review following PRISMA guidelines was conducted. Three databases (EMBASE, PsychInfo and MEDLINE) were searched using the following keywords: "bipolar disorder" or "mood disorder" or "bipolar" combined with "digital" or "mobile" or "phone" or "smartphone" or "mHealth" or "ehealth" or "mobile health" or "app" or "mobile-health".

resultsThirteen articles remained in the review after exclusion criteria were applied. Of the 118 eligible studies, 39 did not provide adherence characteristics. Among the selected papers, study length, sample size and definition of measures of adherence were strongly heterogeneous. Activity rates ranged from 58 to 91.6%.

conclusionThe adherence of bipolar patients to apps is understudied. Standardised measures of adherence should be defined and systematically evaluated in future studies dedicated to these tools.

Indexed as

Bipolar disorderMobile applicationSmartphoneSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID34081234
PMCPMC8175501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.