Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34081233›Full record

Trial reportJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2021

What is the optimal timing of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) after EGG retrieval? A randomized controlled trial.

Meghan B Smith, Jacqueline R Ho, Victoria Cortessis, Irene Jiyao Chen, Kristin A Bendikson, Richard J Paulson, Lynda K McGinnis, Ali Ahmady

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Current State of In Vitro Embryo Production in African Lion (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  7. Is 2-6 h optimal window for ICSI?Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Meghan B SmithKeck School of Medicine, The University of Southern California, 2020 Zonal Avenue Room 534, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4800-3791
Jacqueline R HoKeck School of Medicine, The University of Southern California, 2020 Zonal Avenue Room 534, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA.
Victoria CortessisKeck School of Medicine, The University of Southern California, 2020 Zonal Avenue Room 534, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA.
Irene Jiyao ChenKeck School of Medicine, The University of Southern California, 2020 Zonal Avenue Room 534, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA.
Kristin A BendiksonKeck School of Medicine, The University of Southern California, 2020 Zonal Avenue Room 534, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA.
Richard J PaulsonKeck School of Medicine, The University of Southern California, 2020 Zonal Avenue Room 534, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA.
Lynda K McGinnisKeck School of Medicine, The University of Southern California, 2020 Zonal Avenue Room 534, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA.
Ali AhmadyKeck School of Medicine, The University of Southern California, 2020 Zonal Avenue Room 534, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA. Ali.Ahmady@med.usc.edu.
University of Southern California · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine if oocyte denudation and ICSI at 36.5 versus 39 h post HCG and/or Lupron trigger (2.5 h versus 5 h post-oocyte retrieval) influences fertilization and blastulation rates in good prognosis couples

methodsWe performed a prospective, randomized controlled trial of 12 patients undergoing IVF with ICSI at an academic fertility center, resulting in 206 MII oocytes analyzed. At time of retrieval, patients with more than 10 oocytes retrieved had their oocytes randomized into two groups-one group for oocyte denudation and ICSI at 36.5 h post HCG and/or Lupron trigger and the other group for these procedures at 39 h post HCG and/or Lupron trigger (2.5 and 5 h after oocyte retrieval). Primary outcomes were fertilization and blastulation rates.

resultsNo difference was observed in fertilization rate, total blastulation rate, or day of blastulation based on timing of denudation and ICSI (all p > 0.05). Multiple regression analyses for fertilization and blastulation controlling for age and BMI revealed no difference in fertilization based on time of ICSI (p = 0.38, 0.71, respectively). A conditional logistic regression to account for multiple oocytes derived from each patient also found no difference in fertilization or blastulation based on timing of ICSI, even when controlling for age and BMI (p = 0.47, 0.59, respectively). CONCLUSION(S): In good prognosis couples, we observed no difference in fertilization or blastulation rates based on timing of ICSI within the currently accepted 2- to 6-h window post-retrieval based on a 34-h trigger. The oocyte appears to have a physiological tolerance for fertilization during this window of time, and variability in the timing of ICSI during this window is unlikely to have an impact on cycle outcome.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultFemaleFertilization in VitroHumansOocyte RetrievalOvulation InductionPregnancyProspective StudiesSperm Injections, IntracytoplasmicTime FactorsYoung AdultAndrologyEmbryologyIntracytoplasmic sperm injection

Identifiers

PMID34081233
PMCPMC8417178
OpenAlexW3164801232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.