Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34081128›Full record

ArticleToxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology2021

Diminished Hepatocarcinogenesis by a Potent, High-Affinity Human PPARα Agonist in PPARA-Humanized Mice.

Jennifer E Foreman, Takayuki Koga, Oksana Kosyk, Boo-Hyon Kang, Xiaoyang Zhu, Samuel M Cohen, Laura J Billy, Arun K Sharma, Shantu Amin, Frank J Gonzalez and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Jennifer E ForemanDepartment of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences and Center for Molecular Toxicology and Carcinogenesis, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA.
Takayuki KogaDepartment of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences and Center for Molecular Toxicology and Carcinogenesis, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA.
Oksana KosykDepartment of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA.
Boo-Hyon KangNon-clinical Research Institute, Chemon, Yangji-Myeon, Cheoin-Gu, Yongin-Si, Gyeonggi-Do 17162, Korea.
Xiaoyang ZhuDepartment of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences and Center for Molecular Toxicology and Carcinogenesis, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA.
Samuel M CohenDepartment of Pathology and Microbiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska 68198-3135, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5047-0962
Laura J BillyDepartment of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences and Center for Molecular Toxicology and Carcinogenesis, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA.
Arun K SharmaDepartment of Pharmacology, The Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, Pennsylvania 17033, USA.
Shantu AminDepartment of Pharmacology, The Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, Pennsylvania 17033, USA.
Frank J GonzalezLaboratory of Metabolism, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA.
Ivan RusynDepartment of Veterinary Integrative Biosciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843, USA.
Jeffrey M PetersDepartment of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences and Center for Molecular Toxicology and Carcinogenesis, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA.
Pennsylvania State University · USNational Cancer Institute · USTexas A&M University · USUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Xenobiotic receptorsZIABC005562 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI GONZALEZ, FRANK J · 2009 to 2025
$26.9M
Molecular Mechanisms of Phthalate-induced CarcinogenesisR01ES012686 · NIEHS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI RUSYN, IVAN · 2004 to 2007
$1.1M
Development sensitivity to PPARalpha agonist-induced liver cancerF32ES017568 · NIEHS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI FOREMAN, JENNIFER E · 2009 to 2011
$157k
NIEHS NIH HHS F32 ES017568NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES012686
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ppara-null and PPARA-humanized mice are refractory to hepatocarcinogenesis caused by the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-α (PPARα) agonist Wy-14,643. However, the duration of these earlier studies was limited to approximately 1 year of treatment, and the ligand used has a higher affinity for the mouse PPARα compared to the human PPARα. Thus, the present study examined the effect of long-term administration of a potent, high-affinity human PPARα agonist (GW7647) on hepatocarcinogenesis in wild-type, Ppara-null, or PPARA-humanized mice. In wild-type mice, GW7647 caused hepatic expression of known PPARα target genes, hepatomegaly, hepatic MYC expression, hepatic cytotoxicity, and a high incidence of hepatocarcinogenesis. By contrast, these effects were essentially absent in Ppara-null mice or diminished in PPARA-humanized mice, although hepatocarcinogenesis was observed in both genotypes. Enhanced fatty change (steatosis) was also observed in both Ppara-null and PPARA-humanized mice independent of GW7647. PPARA-humanized mice administered GW7647 also exhibited increased necrosis after 5 weeks of treatment. Results from these studies demonstrate that the mouse PPARα is required for hepatocarcinogenesis induced by GW7647 administered throughout adulthood. Results also indicate that a species difference exists between rodents and human PPARα in the response to ligand activation of PPARα. The hepatocarcinogenesis observed in control and treated Ppara-null mice is likely mediated in part by increased hepatic fatty change, whereas the hepatocarcinogenesis observed in PPARA-humanized mice may also be due to enhanced fatty change and cytotoxicity that could be influenced by the minimal activity of the human PPARα in this mouse line on downstream mouse PPARα target genes. The Ppara-null and PPARA-humanized mouse models are valuable tools for examining the mechanisms of PPARα-induced hepatocarcinogenesis, but the background level of liver cancer must be controlled for in the design and interpretation of studies that use these mice.

Indexed as

Fatty LiverLiver NeoplasmsAdultAnimalsHumansMiceMice, KnockoutPPAR alphaPPAR alphahepatocarcinogenesisperoxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs)species difference

Identifiers

PMID34081128
PMCPMC8502481
OpenAlexW3164801207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.