Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34081013›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2021

The Clinical Decision Support System AMPEL for Laboratory Diagnostics: Implementation and Technical Evaluation.

Maria Beatriz Walter Costa, Mark Wernsdorfer, Alexander Kehrer, Markus Voigt, Carina Cundius, Martin Federbusch, Felix Eckelt, Johannes Remmler, Maria Schmidt, Sarah Pehnke and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Evaluation of an electronic health record Drug Interaction Customization Editor (DICE).American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Refeeding Syndrome.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Maria Beatriz Walter Costa *Institute of Laboratory Medicine, Clinical Chemistry und Molecular Diagnostics, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5143-0858
Mark Wernsdorfer *Institute of Laboratory Medicine, Clinical Chemistry und Molecular Diagnostics, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1316-1615
Alexander KehrerXantas AG, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8914-7222
Markus VoigtInformation Management, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3133-8971
Carina CundiusInformation Management, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0128-3589
Martin FederbuschInstitute of Laboratory Medicine, Clinical Chemistry und Molecular Diagnostics, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1126-5763
Felix EckeltInstitute of Laboratory Medicine, Clinical Chemistry und Molecular Diagnostics, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3412-643X
Johannes RemmlerInstitute of Laboratory Medicine, Clinical Chemistry und Molecular Diagnostics, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2598-3616
Maria SchmidtInstitute of Laboratory Medicine, Clinical Chemistry und Molecular Diagnostics, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9479-3659
Sarah PehnkeInstitute of Laboratory Medicine, Clinical Chemistry und Molecular Diagnostics, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0898-5399
Christiane GärtnerInstitute of Laboratory Medicine, Clinical Chemistry und Molecular Diagnostics, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8095-2463
Markus WehnerMuldental Clinics GmbH Non-Profit Company, Hospital Grimma and Wurzen, Grimma, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9268-714X
Berend IsermannInstitute of Laboratory Medicine, Clinical Chemistry und Molecular Diagnostics, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0714-6160
Heike RichterMuldental Clinics GmbH Non-Profit Company, Hospital Grimma and Wurzen, Grimma, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6075-3624
Jörg TelleXantas AG, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0301-0602
Thorsten KaiserInstitute of Laboratory Medicine, Clinical Chemistry und Molecular Diagnostics, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0523-3113

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLaboratory results are of central importance for clinical decision making. The time span between availability and review of results by clinicians is crucial to patient care. Clinical decision support systems (CDSS) are computational tools that can identify critical values automatically and help decrease treatment delay.

objectiveWith this work, we aimed to implement and evaluate a CDSS that supports health care professionals and improves patient safety. In addition to our experiences, we also describe its main components in a general manner to make it applicable to a wide range of medical institutions and to empower colleagues to implement a similar system in their facilities.

methodsTechnical requirements must be taken into account before implementing a CDSS that performs laboratory diagnostics (labCDSS). These can be planned within the functional components of a reactive software agent, a computational framework for such a CDSS.

resultsWe present AMPEL (Analysis and Reporting System for the Improvement of Patient Safety through Real-Time Integration of Laboratory Findings), a labCDSS that notifies health care professionals if a life-threatening medical condition is detected. We developed and implemented AMPEL at a university hospital and regional hospitals in Germany (University of Leipzig Medical Center and the Muldental Clinics in Grimma and Wurzen). It currently runs 5 different algorithms in parallel: hypokalemia, hypercalcemia, hyponatremia, hyperlactatemia, and acute kidney injury.

conclusionsAMPEL enables continuous surveillance of patients. The system is constantly being evaluated and extended and has the capacity for many more algorithms. We hope to encourage colleagues from other institutions to design and implement similar CDSS using the theory, specifications, and experiences described in this work.

Indexed as

clinical decision support system (CDSS)computational architecturedigital healthlaboratory medicinereactive software agent

Identifiers

PMID34081013
PMCPMC8212627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.