Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34081009›Full record

ArticleJMIR aging2021

Business Models of eHealth Interventions to Support Informal Caregivers of People With Dementia in the Netherlands: Analysis of Case Studies.

Hannah Liane Christie, Lizzy Mitzy Maria Boots, Ivo Hermans, Mark Govers, Huibert Johannes Tange, Frans Rochus Josef Verhey, Majolein de Vugt

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR aging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A scoping review and expert consensus on digital determinants of health.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Digital Transformation in Healthcare: Technology Acceptance and Its Applications.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hannah Liane ChristieAlzheimer Centrum Limburg, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2838-2202
Lizzy Mitzy Maria BootsAlzheimer Centrum Limburg, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8309-4502
Ivo HermansBetawerk, Heerlen, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6650-201X
Mark GoversDepartment of Health Services Research, CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7431-2184
Huibert Johannes TangeDepartment of Family Practice, CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8445-7432
Frans Rochus Josef VerheyAlzheimer Centrum Limburg, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8307-8406
Majolein de VugtAlzheimer Centrum Limburg, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2113-4134
Maastricht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn academic research contexts, eHealth interventions for caregivers of people with dementia have shown ample evidence of effectiveness. However, they are rarely implemented in practice, and much can be learned from their counterparts (commercial, governmental, or other origins) that are already being used in practice.

objectiveThis study aims to examine a sample of case studies of eHealth interventions to support informal caregivers of people with dementia that are currently used in the Netherlands; to investigate what strategies are used to ensure the desirability, feasibility, viability, and sustainability of the interventions; and to apply the lessons learned from this practical, commercial implementation perspective to academically developed eHealth interventions for caregivers of people with dementia.

methodsIn step 1, experts (N=483) in the fields of dementia and eHealth were contacted and asked to recommend interventions that met the following criteria: delivered via the internet; suitable for informal caregivers of people with dementia; accessible in the Netherlands, either in Dutch or in English; and used in practice. The contacted experts were academics working on dementia and psychosocial innovations, industry professionals from eHealth software companies, clinicians, patient organizations, and people with dementia and their caregivers. In step 2, contact persons from the suggested eHealth interventions participated in a semistructured telephone interview. The results were analyzed using a multiple case study methodology.

resultsIn total, the response rate was 7.5% (36/483), and 21 eHealth interventions for caregivers of people with dementia were recommended. Furthermore, 43% (9/21) of the interventions met all 4 criteria and were included in the sample for the case study analysis. Of these 9 interventions, 4 were found to have developed sustainable business models and 5 were implemented in a more exploratory manner and relied on research grants to varying extents, although some had also developed preliminary business models.

conclusionsThese findings suggest that the desirability, feasibility, and viability of eHealth interventions for caregivers of people with dementia are linked to their integration into larger structures, their ownership and support of content internally, their development of information and communication technology services externally, and their offer of fixed, low pricing. The origin of the case studies was also important, as eHealth interventions that had originated in an academic research context less reliably found their way to sustainable implementation. In addition, careful selection of digital transformation strategies, more intersectoral cooperation, and more funding for implementation and business modeling research are recommended to help future developers bring eHealth interventions for caregivers of people with dementia into practice.

Indexed as

business modelingcaregivingdementiaeHealthimplementation

Identifiers

PMID34081009
PMCPMC8212631
OpenAlexW3127351662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.