Observational studyESC heart failure2021
Derivation of an electronic frailty index for predicting short-term mortality in heart failure: a machine learning approach.
Observational study in ESC heart failure, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of machine learning methods for prediction of heart failure mortality and readmission: meta-analysis.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Pooled it
- Association Between Prognostic Nutritional Index and Prognosis in Patients With Heart Failure: A Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Use of Conventional Artificial Intelligence Methods in the Identification of Frailty: A Scoping Review.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2026Article
- Comparison of the long-term prognostic value of different frailty instruments in older inpatients: a 5-year prospective cohort study.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- Predicting outcomes after hospitalisation for COPD exacerbation using machine learning.ERJ open research · 2025Article
- Developing an Electronic Frailty Index (eFI) and a biological age trajectory with a cohort of over one million older adults in Hong Kong.The Journal of frailty & aging · 2025Article
- Correlation Between Prognostic Nutritional Index and Heart Failure in Adults with Diabetes in the United States: Study Results from NHANES (1999-2016).Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Explainable machine learning model for pre-frailty risk assessment in community-dwelling older adults.Health care science · 2024Article
- Development and validation of an electronic frailty index in a national health maintenance organization.Aging · 2024Article
- What is the additive value of nutritional deficiency to VA-FI in the risk assessment for heart failure patients?The journal of nutrition, health & aging · 2024Article
- Article
- About the associations of vitamin D deficiency and biomarkers of systemic inflammatory response with all-cause and cause-specific mortality in a general population sample of almost 400,000 UK Biobank participants.European journal of epidemiology · 2023Article
- Development and Validation of R-hf Risk Score in Acute Heart Failure Patients in the Middle East.Oman medical journal · 2023Article
- Correlation between the prognostic nutritional index and outcomes in older patients aged ≥ 60 years with chronic heart failure.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2023Observational
- Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) as a Predictor in Patients with Metabolic Syndrome and Heart Failure.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2023Article
- Electrocardiogram-based artificial intelligence for the diagnosis of heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of geriatric cardiology : JGC · 2022Article
- Heart failure: an update from the last years and a look at the near future.ESC heart failure · 2022Review
- The Impact of Cardiac Comorbidity Sequence at Baseline and Mortality Risk in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Retrospective Population-Based Cohort Study.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Machine Learning Approaches for the Frailty Screening: A Narrative Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Review
- Development of an Electronic Frailty Index for Predicting Mortality and Complications Analysis in Pulmonary Hypertension Using Random Survival Forest Model.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 8 institutions in 6 countries.
Funding
Abstract
aimsFrailty may be found in heart failure patients especially in the elderly and is associated with a poor prognosis. However, assessment of frailty status is time-consuming, and the electronic frailty indices developed using health records have served as useful surrogates. We hypothesized that an electronic frailty index developed using machine learning can improve short-term mortality prediction in patients with heart failure. METHODS AND
resultsThis was a retrospective observational study that included patients admitted to nine public hospitals for heart failure from Hong Kong between 2013 and 2017. Age, sex, variables in the modified frailty index, Deyo's Charlson co-morbidity index (≥2), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and prognostic nutritional index at baseline were analysed. Gradient boosting, which is a supervised sequential ensemble learning algorithm with weak prediction submodels (typically decision trees), was applied to predict mortality. Variables were ranked in the order of importance with a total score of 100 and used to build the frailty models. Comparisons were made with decision tree and multivariable logistic regression. A total of 8893 patients (median: age 81, Q1-Q3: 71-87 years old) were included, in whom 9% had 30 day mortality and 17% had 90 day mortality. Prognostic nutritional index, age, and NLR were the most important variables predicting 30 day mortality (importance score: 37.4, 32.1, and 20.5, respectively) and 90 day mortality (importance score: 35.3, 36.3, and 14.6, respectively). Gradient boosting significantly outperformed decision tree and multivariable logistic regression. The area under the curve from a five-fold cross validation was 0.90 for gradient boosting and 0.87 and 0.86 for decision tree and logistic regression in predicting 30 day mortality. For the prediction of 90 day mortality, the area under the curve was 0.92, 0.89, and 0.86 for gradient boosting, decision tree, and logistic regression, respectively.
conclusionsThe electronic frailty index based on co-morbidities, inflammation, and nutrition information can readily predict mortality outcomes. Their predictive performances were significantly improved by gradient boosting techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.