Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34080784›Full record

Observational studyESC heart failure2021

Derivation of an electronic frailty index for predicting short-term mortality in heart failure: a machine learning approach.

Chengsheng Ju, Jiandong Zhou, Sharen Lee, Martin Sebastian Tan, Tong Liu, George Bazoukis, Kamalan Jeevaratnam, Esther W Y Chan, Ian Chi Kei Wong, Li Wei and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in ESC heart failure, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) as a Predictor in Patients with Metabolic Syndrome and Heart Failure.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Machine Learning Approaches for the Frailty Screening: A Narrative Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 6 countries.

Chengsheng JuResearch Department of Practice and Policy, School of Pharmacy, University College London, London, UK.
Jiandong ZhouSchool of Data Science, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Sharen LeeCardiovascular Analytics Group, Laboratory of Cardiovascular Physiology, LKS Institute of Health Sciences, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Martin Sebastian TanFaculty of Arts and Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Tong LiuTianjin Key Laboratory of Ionic-Molecular Function of Cardiovascular Disease, Department of Cardiology, Tianjin Institute of Cardiology, Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
George BazoukisSecond Department of Cardiology, Evangelismos General Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Kamalan JeevaratnamFaculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.
Esther W Y ChanCentre for Safe Medication Practice and Research, Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Ian Chi Kei WongResearch Department of Practice and Policy, School of Pharmacy, University College London, London, UK.
Li WeiResearch Department of Practice and Policy, School of Pharmacy, University College London, London, UK.
Qingpeng ZhangSchool of Data Science, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Gary TseTianjin Key Laboratory of Ionic-Molecular Function of Cardiovascular Disease, Department of Cardiology, Tianjin Institute of Cardiology, Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5510-1253
University of London · GBCity University of Hong Kong · HKUniversity of Surrey · GBChinese University of Hong Kong · HKEvangelismos Hospital · GRInstitute for Safe Medication Practices · USSecond Hospital of Tianjin Medical University · CNUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

Medical Research Council G106/1249
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsFrailty may be found in heart failure patients especially in the elderly and is associated with a poor prognosis. However, assessment of frailty status is time-consuming, and the electronic frailty indices developed using health records have served as useful surrogates. We hypothesized that an electronic frailty index developed using machine learning can improve short-term mortality prediction in patients with heart failure. METHODS AND

resultsThis was a retrospective observational study that included patients admitted to nine public hospitals for heart failure from Hong Kong between 2013 and 2017. Age, sex, variables in the modified frailty index, Deyo's Charlson co-morbidity index (≥2), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and prognostic nutritional index at baseline were analysed. Gradient boosting, which is a supervised sequential ensemble learning algorithm with weak prediction submodels (typically decision trees), was applied to predict mortality. Variables were ranked in the order of importance with a total score of 100 and used to build the frailty models. Comparisons were made with decision tree and multivariable logistic regression. A total of 8893 patients (median: age 81, Q1-Q3: 71-87 years old) were included, in whom 9% had 30 day mortality and 17% had 90 day mortality. Prognostic nutritional index, age, and NLR were the most important variables predicting 30 day mortality (importance score: 37.4, 32.1, and 20.5, respectively) and 90 day mortality (importance score: 35.3, 36.3, and 14.6, respectively). Gradient boosting significantly outperformed decision tree and multivariable logistic regression. The area under the curve from a five-fold cross validation was 0.90 for gradient boosting and 0.87 and 0.86 for decision tree and logistic regression in predicting 30 day mortality. For the prediction of 90 day mortality, the area under the curve was 0.92, 0.89, and 0.86 for gradient boosting, decision tree, and logistic regression, respectively.

conclusionsThe electronic frailty index based on co-morbidities, inflammation, and nutrition information can readily predict mortality outcomes. Their predictive performances were significantly improved by gradient boosting techniques.

Indexed as

FrailtyHeart FailureAgedAged, 80 and overElectronicsHumansMachine LearningRetrospective StudiesFrailty indexHeart failureInflammationMachine learningMortalityNutrition

Identifiers

PMID34080784
PMCPMC8318426
OpenAlexW3164985898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.