Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34080754›Full record

ReviewThe oncologist2021

Multidisciplinary Care of BRAF-Mutant Stage III Melanoma: A Physicians Perspective Review.

Lynn A Cornelius, Ryan C Fields, Ahmad Tarhini

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The oncologist, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Journal of surgical oncology · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lynn A CorneliusDivision of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA.
Ryan C FieldsDepartment of Surgery, Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA.
Ahmad TarhiniDepartments of Cutaneous Oncology and Immunology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3193-9702
Barnes-Jewish Hospital · USUniversity of South Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prognosis among patients with stage III melanoma can vary widely depending on the risk of disease relapse. Therefore, it is vital to optimize patient care through accurate diagnosis and staging as well as thoughtful treatment planning. A multidisciplinary team (MDT) approach, which involves active collaboration among physician specialists across a patient's disease journey, has been increasingly adopted as the standard of care for treatment of a variety of cancers, including melanoma. This review provides an overview of MDT care principles for patients with BRAF-mutant-positive, stage III cutaneous melanoma and summarizes current literature, clinical experiences, and institutional best practices. Therapeutic goals from dermatologic, surgical, and medical oncologist perspectives regarding MDT care throughout a patient's disease course are discussed. Additionally, the role of each specialty's involvement in testing for predictive biomarkers at relevant time points to facilitate informed treatment decisions is discussed. Last, instances of successful MDT treatment of other cancers and key lessons to optimize MDT patient care in cutaneous melanoma are provided. Several aspects of MDT patient care are considered vital, such as the importance of staging via pathological examination and imaging, biomarker testing, and interdisciplinary physician and patient engagement throughout the course of treatment. Use of MDTs has the potential to improve patient care in cutaneous melanoma by improving the speed and accuracy of diagnosis, implementing a personalized treatment plan early on, and being proactive in adverse event management. Physician perspectives described in this review may lead to better outcomes, quality of life, and overall patient satisfaction. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: As more cancer therapies emerge, it is critical to optimize patient care and treatment planning. The multidisciplinary team (MDT) approach, which involves active collaboration among specialists, has led to encouraging survival results in multiple cancer types. As MDT care becomes more widely adopted in the treatment of melanoma, accurate diagnosis and staging are important, as clinical outcomes for stage III disease vary widely by substage. Because ~50% of melanomas harbor BRAF mutations, testing is important for an informed treatment decision. Interdisciplinary physician-patient engagement throughout the course of treatment can improve comorbidity and adverse event management to optimize patients' treatment journeys.

Indexed as

MelanomaOncologistsSkin NeoplasmsHumansPatient Care TeamProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafQuality of LifeBRAF protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafBRAFDiagnosisMelanomaMultidisciplinary carePatient journey

Identifiers

PMID34080754
PMCPMC8417868
OpenAlexW3164675648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.