SynthesisMagnetic resonance in medicine2021
Electric field calculation and peripheral nerve stimulation prediction for head and body gradient coils.
Synthesis in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reassessment of peripheral nerve stimulation thresholds for the Impulse model-optimized asymmetric head gradient coil.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
- Experimental validation of a PNS-optimized whole-body gradient coil.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2024Article
- Influence of peripheral axon geometry and local anatomy on magnetostimulation chronaxie.Journal of neural engineering · 2024Article
- Occupational Exposure Assessment of the Static Magnetic Field Generated by Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy: A Case Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- A Huygens' surface approach to rapid characterization of peripheral nerve stimulation.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2022Article
- Evaluation of Peripheral Electrostimulation Thresholds in Human Model for Uniform Magnetic Field Exposure.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Minimum electric-field gradient coil design: Theoretical limits and practical guidelines.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo demonstrate and validate electric field (E-field) calculation and peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) prediction methods that are accurate, computationally efficient, and that could be used to inform regulatory standards.
methodsWe describe a simplified method for calculating the spatial distribution of induced E-field over the volume of a body model given a gradient coil vector potential field. The method is easily programmed without finite element or finite difference software, allowing for straightforward and computationally efficient E-field evaluation. Using these E-field calculations and a range of body models, population-weighted PNS thresholds are determined using established methods and compared against published experimental PNS data for two head gradient coils and one body gradient coil.
resultsA head-gradient-appropriate chronaxie value of 669 µs was determined by meta-analysis. Prediction errors between our calculated PNS parameters and the corresponding experimentally measured values were ~5% for the body gradient and ~20% for the symmetric head gradient. Our calculated PNS parameters matched experimental measurements to within experimental uncertainty for 73% of ∆G
conclusionsWe have developed accurate and computationally efficient methods for prospectively determining PNS limits, with specific application to head gradient coils.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.