Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34080721›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2021

Radiofrequency-induced heating of broken and abandoned implant leads during magnetic resonance examinations.

Aiping Yao, Tolga Goren, Theodoros Samaras, Niels Kuster, Wolfgang Kainz

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. SCMR expert consensus statement for cardiovascular magnetic resonance of patients with a cardiac implantable electronic device.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2024
    Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Implants talk to each-other: RF heating changes when two DBS leads are present simultaneously during MRI.Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference · 2023
    Article
  8. EHRA consensus on prevention and management of interference due to medical procedures in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Aiping YaoFoundation of Research on Information Technologies in Society (IT'IS), Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-3859-2684
Tolga GorenFoundation of Research on Information Technologies in Society (IT'IS), Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-4377-0676
Theodoros SamarasDepartment of Physics, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-0170-4520
Niels KusterFoundation of Research on Information Technologies in Society (IT'IS), Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-5827-3728
Wolfgang KainzCenter for Devices and Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9165-4135
Foundation for Research on Information Technologies in Society · CHAristotle University of Thessaloniki · GRCenter for Devices and Radiological Health · USETH Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe risks of RF-induced heating of active implantable medical device (AIMD) leads during MR examinations must be well understood and realistically assessed. In this study, we evaluate the potential additional risks of broken and abandoned (cut) leads.

methodsFirst, we defined a generic AIMD with a metallic implantable pulse generator (IPG) and a 100-cm long lead containing 1 or 2 wires. Next, we numerically estimated the deposited in vitro lead-tip power for an intact lead, as well as with wire breaks placed at 10 cm intervals. We studied the effect of the break size (wire gap width), as well as the presence of an intact wire parallel to the broken wire, and experimentally validated the numeric results for the configurations with maximum deposited in vitro lead-tip power. Finally, we performed a Tier 3 assessment of the deposited in vivo lead-tip power for the intact and broken lead in 4 high resolution virtual population anatomic models for over 54,000 MR examination scenarios.

resultsThe enhancement of the deposited lead-tip power for the broken leads, compared to the intact lead, reached 30-fold in isoelectric exposure, and 16-fold in realistic clinical exposures. The presence of a nearby intact wire, or even a nearby broken wire, reduced this enhancement factor to <7-fold over the intact lead.

conclusionBroken and abandoned leads can pose increased risk of RF-induced lead-tip heating to patients undergoing MR examinations. The potential enhancement of deposited in vivo lead-tip power depends on location and type of the wire break, lead design, and clinical routing of the lead, and should be carefully considered when performing risk assessment for MR examinations and MR conditional labeling.

Indexed as

HeatingMagnetic Resonance ImagingHot TemperatureHumansMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyPhantoms, ImagingProstheses and ImplantsRadio WavesAIMDimplant safetylead damageMRIMR safetyRF heatingvirtual population

Identifiers

PMID34080721
PMCPMC8362172
OpenAlexW3165615266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.