Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34080630›Full record

ArticleGigaScience2021

A large-scale metagenomic survey dataset of the post-weaning piglet gut lumen.

Daniela Gaio, Matthew Z DeMaere, Kay Anantanawat, Graeme J Eamens, Michael Liu, Tiziana Zingali, Linda Falconer, Toni A Chapman, Steven P Djordjevic, Aaron E Darling

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GigaScience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Hackflex library preparation enables low-cost metagenomic profiling.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Daniela GaioThe iThree Institute, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7695-3145
Matthew Z DeMaereThe iThree Institute, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7601-5108
Kay AnantanawatThe iThree Institute, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7862-0969
Graeme J EamensNSW Department of Primary Industries, Elizabeth Macarthur Agricultural Institute, Woodbridge Rd, Menangle NSW 2568, Australia.
Michael LiuThe iThree Institute, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8467-3215
Tiziana ZingaliThe iThree Institute, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1526-1823
Linda FalconerNSW Department of Primary Industries, Elizabeth Macarthur Agricultural Institute, Woodbridge Rd, Menangle NSW 2568, Australia.
Toni A ChapmanNSW Department of Primary Industries, Elizabeth Macarthur Agricultural Institute, Woodbridge Rd, Menangle NSW 2568, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4571-1629
Steven P DjordjevicThe iThree Institute, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9301-5372
Aaron E DarlingThe iThree Institute, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2397-7925
University of Technology Sydney · AUNew South Wales Department of Primary Industries · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly weaning and intensive farming practices predispose piglets to the development of infectious and often lethal diseases, against which antibiotics are used. Besides contributing to the build-up of antimicrobial resistance, antibiotics are known to modulate the gut microbial composition. As an alternative to antibiotic treatment, studies have previously investigated the potential of probiotics for the prevention of postweaning diarrhea. In order to describe the post-weaning gut microbiota, and to study the effects of two probiotics formulations and of intramuscular antibiotic treatment on the gut microbiota, we sampled and processed over 800 faecal time-series samples from 126 piglets and 42 sows.

resultsHere we report on the largest shotgun metagenomic dataset of the pig gut lumen microbiome to date, consisting of >8 Tbp of shotgun metagenomic sequencing data. The animal trial, the workflow from sample collection to sample processing, and the preparation of libraries for sequencing, are described in detail. We provide a preliminary analysis of the dataset, centered on a taxonomic profiling of the samples, and a 16S-based beta diversity analysis of the mothers and the piglets in the first 5 weeks after weaning.

conclusionsThis study was conducted to generate a publicly available databank of the faecal metagenome of weaner piglets aged between 3 and 9 weeks old, treated with different probiotic formulations and intramuscular antibiotic treatment. Besides investigating the effects of the probiotic and intramuscular antibiotic treatment, the dataset can be explored to assess a wide range of ecological questions with regards to antimicrobial resistance, host-associated microbial and phage communities, and their dynamics during the aging of the host.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeProbioticsAnimalsFemaleMetagenomeMetagenomicsSwineWeaning

Identifiers

PMID34080630
PMCPMC8173662
OpenAlexW3164517331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.