SynthesisRheumatology (Oxford, England)2021
Targeted literature review of current treatments and unmet need in moderate rheumatoid arthritis in the United Kingdom.
Synthesis in Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of filgotinib in patients with moderately active rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to methotrexate.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2025Trial
- Dynamic psychological vulnerability and adaptation in rheumatoid arthritis: Trajectories, predictors, and interventions.World journal of psychiatry · 2026Review
- What have we learnt from the inhibition of IL-6 in RA and what are the clinical opportunities for patient outcomes?Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease · 2024Review
- Approaches to optimising access to NICE-approved biologic anti-TNFs for patients with rheumatoid arthritis with moderately active disease.BMC medicine · 2023Article
- An orally available small molecule that targets soluble TNF to deliver anti-TNF biologic-like efficacy in rheumatoid arthritis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThe burden and treatment landscape of RA is poorly understood. This research aimed to identify evidence on quality of life, caregiver burden, economic burden, treatment patterns and clinical outcomes for patients with moderate RA in the United Kingdom.
methodsA systematic literature review was performed across multiple databases and screened against pre-defined inclusion criteria.
resultsA total of 2610 records were screened; seven studies presenting evidence for moderate RA were included. These patients were found to incur substantial burden, with moderate to severe levels of disability. Compared with patients in remission, moderate RA patients reported higher levels of disability and decreased EQ-5D utility scores. The majority of patients did not feel that their current therapy adequately controlled their disease or provided sufficient symptom relief. In the United Kingdom, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) have not approved advanced therapies (such as biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs) for patients with moderate disease, which restricts access for these patients.
conclusionThe evidence available on the burden of moderate RA is limited. Despite current treatments, moderate RA still has a substantial negative impact, given that a DAS28 disease activity score defined as being in the moderate range does not qualify them for access to advanced therapies in the United Kingdom. For these patients, there is a particular need for further studies that investigate their burden and the impact of treating them earlier. Such information would help guide future treatment decisions and ensure the most effective use of resources to gain the best outcomes for patients with moderate RA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.