ReviewJournal of cardiovascular imaging2022
Coronary Artery Disease Reporting and Data System: A Comprehensive Review.
Review in Journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Plaque Progression and Rupture in Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease: A Review of Current Imaging Modalities.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- CT Angiography in Patients Referred for Invasive Coronary Angiography: A Single Large-Volume Tertiary Center Experience.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Refining the role of coronary CT angiography: addressing challenges and advancing practice.Irish journal of medical science · 2025Article
- Rare case of concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting and open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.Journal of surgical case reports · 2024Article
- Discrepancies between Coronary Artery Calcium Score and Coronary Artery Disease Severity in Computed Tomography Angiography Studies.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Non-contrast CT-based radiomics nomogram of pericoronary adipose tissue for predicting haemodynamically significant coronary stenosis in patients with type 2 diabetes.BMC medical imaging · 2023Article
- The value of Coronary Artery Disease - Reporting and Data System (CAD-RADS) in Outcome Prediction of CAD Patients; a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Archives of academic emergency medicine · 2023Review
- Investigation of the Frequency of Coronary Artery Anomalies in MDCT Coronary Angiography and Comparison of Atherosclerotic Involvement between Anomaly Types.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2022Article
- Effects of Serum LDL-C, CysC, and D-D in Patients with Coronary Atherosclerotic Heart Disease.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Coronary Artery Disease Reporting and Data System (CAD-RADS) is a standardized reporting method for coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA). It summarizes the findings of CCTA in 6 categories ranging from CAD-RADS 0 (complete absence of coronary artery disease) to CAD-RADS 5 (total occlusion of at least one vessel). It is applied on per patient basis for the highest grade of the stenotic lesion. The CAD-RADS also provides category-specific treatment recommendations, helping patient management. The main objectives of the CAD-RADS are to improve the consistency in reporting, facilitate the communication between interpreting and referring clinicians, recommend the best course of patient management, and produce consistent data for quality improvement, research and education. However, CAD-RADS has many limitations, resulting into the misclassification of the observed findings, misinterpretation of the final category, and misguidance for the treatment based upon the single score. In this review, the authors discuss the CAD-RADS categories and modifiers, along with the strengths and limitations of this new classification system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.