Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34080283›Full record

ReviewBiological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society2021

Biodiversity as insurance: from concept to measurement and application.

Michel Loreau, Matthieu Barbier, Elise Filotas, Dominique Gravel, Forest Isbell, Steve J Miller, Jose M Montoya, Shaopeng Wang, Raphaël Aussenac, Rachel Germain and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 82 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
82citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

82 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Subterranean environments contribute to three-quarters of classified ecosystem services.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Michel LoreauTheoretical and Experimental Ecology Station, CNRS, 2 route du CNRS, Moulis, 09200, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0122-495X
Matthieu BarbierTheoretical and Experimental Ecology Station, CNRS, 2 route du CNRS, Moulis, 09200, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0669-8927
Elise FilotasCenter for Forest Research, Université du Québec (TELUQ), 5800 Saint-Denis, Montreal, QC, H2S 3L5, Canada.
Dominique GravelDépartement de Biologie, Université de Sherbrooke, 2500 Boulevard de l'Université, Sherbrooke, QC, J1K 2R1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4498-7076
Forest IsbellDepartment of Ecology, Evolution and Behavior, University of Minnesota, 1479 Gortner Ave, St. Paul, MN, 55108, U.S.A.ORCID 0000-0001-9689-769X
Steve J MillerEnvironmental Studies Program, University of Colorado, Boulder, 4001 Discovery Drive, Boulder, CO, 80303, U.S.A.
Jose M MontoyaTheoretical and Experimental Ecology Station, CNRS, 2 route du CNRS, Moulis, 09200, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6676-7592
Shaopeng WangInstitute of Ecology, College of Urban and Environmental Sciences and Key Laboratory for Earth Surface Processes of the Ministry of Education, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China.
Raphaël AussenacUniversité Grenoble Alpes, INRAE, LESSEM, St-Martin-d'Hères, F-38402, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1191-4716
Rachel GermainBiodiversity Research Centre and Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia, 6270 University Blvd., Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada.
Patrick L ThompsonBiodiversity Research Centre and Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia, 6270 University Blvd., Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5278-9045
Andrew GonzalezDepartment of Biology, McGill University, 1205 Dr. Penfield Avenue, Montreal, QC, H3A 1B1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6075-8081
Laura E DeeDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, 1900 Pleasant St., Boulder, CO, 80303, U.S.A.ORCID 0000-0003-0471-1371

Funding

European Research Council 726176
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biological insurance theory predicts that, in a variable environment, aggregate ecosystem properties will vary less in more diverse communities because declines in the performance or abundance of some species or phenotypes will be offset, at least partly, by smoother declines or increases in others. During the past two decades, ecology has accumulated strong evidence for the stabilising effect of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning. As biological insurance is reaching the stage of a mature theory, it is critical to revisit and clarify its conceptual foundations to guide future developments, applications and measurements. In this review, we first clarify the connections between the insurance and portfolio concepts that have been used in ecology and the economic concepts that inspired them. Doing so points to gaps and mismatches between ecology and economics that could be filled profitably by new theoretical developments and new management applications. Second, we discuss some fundamental issues in biological insurance theory that have remained unnoticed so far and that emerge from some of its recent applications. In particular, we draw a clear distinction between the two effects embedded in biological insurance theory, i.e. the effects of biodiversity on the mean and variability of ecosystem properties. This distinction allows explicit consideration of trade-offs between the mean and stability of ecosystem processes and services. We also review applications of biological insurance theory in ecosystem management. Finally, we provide a synthetic conceptual framework that unifies the various approaches across disciplines, and we suggest new ways in which biological insurance theory could be extended to address new issues in ecology and ecosystem management. Exciting future challenges include linking the effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning and stability, incorporating multiple functions and feedbacks, developing new approaches to partition biodiversity effects across scales, extending biological insurance theory to complex interaction networks, and developing new applications to biodiversity and ecosystem management.

Indexed as

EcosystemInsuranceBiodiversityEcologybiodiversityecosystemsinsurancemanagementportfoliostabilitytheory

Identifiers

PMID34080283
PMCPMC8519139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.