ArticleNMR in biomedicine2021
Oxygen-enhanced functional lung imaging using a contemporary 0.55 T MRI system.
Article in NMR in biomedicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Contemporary 0.55 T MRI for Lung Disease Assessment in Children and Young Adults with Cystic Fibrosis: A Proof-of-Concept Study.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2026Article
- Acceleration of slice encoding for metal artifact correction at 0.55 T using hexagonal sampling.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Liver fat quantification at 0.55 T enabled by locally low-rank enforced deep learning reconstruction.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Determinants of image quality in respiratory triggered free breathing lung MRI at 0.55 T in adults.Radiology advances · 2026Article
- Diffuse cystic lung diseases-a primer for radiologists.BJR open · 2026Review
- Review
- Assessment of the Diagnostic Efficacy of Low-Field Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Systematic Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Feasibility of dynamic TMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2024Article
- Cardiac MRI at Low Field Strengths.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2024Review
- New clinical opportunities of low-field MRI: heart, lung, body, and musculoskeletal.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2024Review
- Dynamic lung water MRI during exercise stress.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2023Article
- Concomitant field compensation of spiral turbo spin-echo at 0.55 T.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2023Article
- Tackling SNR at low-field: a review of hardware approaches for point-of-care systems.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2023Review
- MR imaging of the airways.The British journal of radiology · 2023Review
- M4Raw: A multi-contrast, multi-repetition, multi-channel MRI k-space dataset for low-field MRI research.Scientific data · 2023Article
- Lung parenchyma transverse relaxation rates at 0.55 T.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2023Article
- Diagnostic Image Quality of a Low-Field (0.55T) Knee MRI Protocol Using Deep Learning Image Reconstruction Compared with a Standard (1.5T) Knee MRI Protocol.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Imaging gravity-induced lung water redistribution with automated inline processing at 0.55 T cardiovascular magnetic resonance.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2022Article
- Measuring short-term changes in specific ventilation using dynamic specific ventilation imaging.Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) · 2022Article
- [Low-field magnetic resonance imaging : Just less expensive or completely different?]Der Radiologe · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate oxygen-enhanced pulmonary imaging at 0.55 T with 3D stack-of-spirals ultrashort-T
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.