Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34080104›Full record

ReviewJournal of digital imaging2021

A Review on Joint Carotid Intima-Media Thickness and Plaque Area Measurement in Ultrasound for Cardiovascular/Stroke Risk Monitoring: Artificial Intelligence Framework.

Mainak Biswas, Luca Saba, Tomaž Omerzu, Amer M Johri, Narendra N Khanna, Klaudija Viskovic, Sophie Mavrogeni, John R Laird, Gyan Pareek, Martin Miner and 12 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of digital imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 17 institutions in 10 countries.

Mainak BiswasJIS University Kolkata, West Bengal, Kolkata, India.
Luca SabaDepartment of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (A.O.U.), Cagliari, Italy.
Tomaž OmerzuDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Centre Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia.
Amer M JohriDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Narendra N KhannaDepartment of Cardiology, Indraprastha APOLLO Hospitals, New Delhi, India.
Klaudija ViskovicUniversity Hospital for Infectious Diseases, Zagreb, Croatia.
Sophie MavrogeniCardiology Clinic, Onassis Cardiac Surgery Center, Athens, Greece.
John R LairdHeart and Vascular Institute, Adventist Health St. Helena, St Helena, CA, USA.
Gyan PareekMinimally Invasive Urology Institute, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
Martin MinerMen's Health Center, Miriam Hospital Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
Antonella BalestrieriDepartment of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (A.O.U.), Cagliari, Italy.
Petros P SfikakisRheumatology Unit, National Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Athanasios ProtogerouNational, Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Durga Prasanna MisraSanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, UP, India.
Vikas AgarwalSanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, UP, India.
George D KitasAcademic Affairs, Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust, Dudley, UK.
Raghu KolluriOhio Health Heart and Vascular, Columbus, OH, USA.
Aditya SharmaDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Vijay ViswanathanMV Hospital for Diabetes and Professor M Viswanathan Diabetes Research Centre, Chennai, India.
Zoltan RuzsaInvasive Cardiology Division, University of Szeged, Budapest, Hungary.
Andrew NicolaidesVascular Screening and Diagnostic Centre, University of Nicosia Medical School, Nicosia, Cyprus.
Jasjit S SuriStroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA, 95661, USA. Jasjit.Suri@AtheroPoint.com.
Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Cagliari · ITNational and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GRSanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences · INBrown University · USDudley Group NHS Foundation Trust · GBMiriam Hospital · USM.V. Hospital for Diabetes and Diabetes Research Centre · INOhioHealth · USOnassis Cardiac Surgery Center · GRQueen's University · CARhopoint Instruments (United Kingdom) · GBSt. Helena Hospital · USUniversity Clinical Centre Maribor · SIUniversity Hospital Centre Zagreb · HRUniversity of Nicosia · CYUniversity of Szeged · HUUniversity of Virginia · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are the top ten leading causes of death worldwide. Atherosclerosis disease in the arteries is the main cause of the CVD, leading to myocardial infarction and stroke. The two primary image-based phenotypes used for monitoring the atherosclerosis burden is carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) and plaque area (PA). Earlier segmentation and measurement methods were based on ad hoc conventional and semi-automated digital imaging solutions, which are unreliable, tedious, slow, and not robust. This study reviews the modern and automated methods such as artificial intelligence (AI)-based. Machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) can provide automated techniques in the detection and measurement of cIMT and PA from carotid vascular images. Both ML and DL techniques are examples of supervised learning, i.e., learn from "ground truth" images and transformation of test images that are not part of the training. This review summarizes (1) the evolution and impact of the fast-changing AI technology on cIMT/PA measurement, (2) the mathematical representations of ML/DL methods, and (3) segmentation approaches for cIMT/PA regions in carotid scans based for (a) region-of-interest detection and (b) lumen-intima and media-adventitia interface detection using ML/DL frameworks. AI-based methods for cIMT/PA segmentation have emerged for CVD/stroke risk monitoring and may expand to the recommended parameters for atherosclerosis assessment by carotid ultrasound.

Indexed as

Carotid Intima-Media ThicknessStrokeArtificial IntelligenceCarotid ArteriesHumansUltrasonographyArtificial intelligenceAtherosclerosisCarotid intima-media thicknessCarotid plaque areaCarotid ultrasoundDeep learningMachine learningPlaque

Identifiers

PMID34080104
PMCPMC8329154
OpenAlexW3164274340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.