Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34080096›Full record

ReviewEndocrine2021

Inferior petrosal sinus sampling in Cushing's syndrome: usefulness and pitfalls.

D A Vassiliadi, P Mourelatos, T Kratimenos, S Tsagarakis

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Endocrine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Approach to the Patient: Diagnosis of Cushing Syndrome.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

D A VassiliadiDepartment of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Evangelismos Hospital, Athens, Greece.
P MourelatosDepartment of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Evangelismos Hospital, Athens, Greece.
T KratimenosDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Evangelismos Hospital, Athens, Greece.
S TsagarakisDepartment of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Evangelismos Hospital, Athens, Greece. stsagara@otenet.gr.
Evangelismos Hospital · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In patients with ACTH-dependent Cushing's syndrome (CS), the differentiation between Cushing's disease (CD) and ectopic ACTH secretion (EAS) can often be challenging. The traditionally used biochemical tests have limited diagnostic accuracy and imaging modalities may fail to detect the culprit lesion. Inferior petrosal sinus sampling (IPSS) was introduced more than 3 decades ago as a test with optimal diagnostic accuracy and has since become the gold standard in the differential diagnosis between CD and EAS. However, several, albeit rare, pitfalls may limit its diagnostic accuracy and awareness is needed to avoid incorrect interventions. Moreover, it is an invasive and demanding procedure, available in a limited number of centers worldwide. This review aims to critically present the usefulness and pitfalls of IPSS and define strategies for its optimal place in the contemporary management of CS.

Indexed as

ACTH Syndrome, EctopicCushing SyndromePituitary ACTH HypersecretionAdrenocorticotropic HormoneDiagnosis, DifferentialHumansPetrosal Sinus SamplingAdrenocorticotropic HormoneACTH-dependent Cushing’s syndromeCushing’s diseaseEctopic ACTH secretionInferior petrosal sinus sampling

Identifiers

PMID34080096
OpenAlexW3164825167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.