ArticleNeurocritical care2021
Prognostic Uncertainty in Critically Ill Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury: A Multicenter Qualitative Study.
Article in Neurocritical care, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed.
- What aspects of clinical uncertainty are addressed by published competencies in evidence-based medicine? A scoping review.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Current status and influencing factors of decision conflict among surrogate decision-makers for patients with severe traumatic brain injury in the ICU.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Disorders of consciousness diagnosis, interventions, and prognostication for the intensivist: Report of the 2025 ISICEM roundtable.Intensive care medicine · 2026Review
- Communicating with Families after Severe Acute Brain Injury.Neurocritical care · 2025Review
- Framing the Multi-Centre Qualitative Research Design as a Novel Methodology for Nursing and Healthcare Research: Reflections and A Methodological Discussion.Journal of advanced nursing · 2025Article
- Development of web- and mobile-based shared decision-making tools in the neurological intensive care unit.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2025Review
- Equity in Clinical Care and Research Involving Persons with Disorders of Consciousness.Neurocritical care · 2024Review
- Development and psychometric evaluation of uncertainty about disease and treatment scale in hemodialysis patients: a sequential-exploratory mixed-method study.BMC psychology · 2024Review
- An Update on Palliative Care in Neurocritical Care: Providing Goal‑Concordant Care in the Face of Prognostic Uncertainty.Current treatment options in neurology · 2023Article
- Disambiguating Consciousness in Clinical Settings.Neurology · 2023Article
- Study on serum miR-185-5p in assessing the injury severity and prognosis of patients with traumatic brain injury.Journal of medical biochemistry · 2023Article
- Prevalence and predictors of shared decision-making in goals-of-care clinician-family meetings for critically ill neurologic patients: a multi-center mixed-methods study.Critical care (London, England) · 2023Article
- Early Shared Decision-Making for Older Adults with Traumatic Brain Injury: Using Time-Limited Trials and Understanding Their Limitations.Neurocritical care · 2023Article
- Physician experience improves ability to predict 6-month functional outcome of severe traumatic brain injury.Acta neurochirurgica · 2023Observational
- Exploring the Experiences of Family Members When a Patient Is Admitted to the ICU with a Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Scoping Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Prognostic Discussion for Infants with Neurologic Conditions: Qualitative Analysis of Family Conferences.Annals of neurology · 2022Article
- Neuroprognostication: a conceptual framework.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2022Review
- Ethics and the 2018 Practice Guideline on Disorders of Consciousness: A Framework for Responsible Implementation.Neurology · 2022Article
- Return to Work Within Four Months of Grade 3 Diffuse Axonal Injury.The Neurohospitalist · 2022Article
- Taking a Chance to Recover: Families Look Back on the Decision to Pursue Tracheostomy After Severe Acute Brain Injury.Neurocritical care · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPrognostic uncertainty is frequently cited as a barrier to communication between physicians and patients and is particularly burdensome for surrogate decision-makers, who must make choices on behalf of their incapacitated family members. The Conceptual Taxonomy of Uncertainty is one model through which physician and surrogate communication can be analyzed to identify strategies for reducing uncertainty in surrogate decision-making. Our objective was to examine themes of uncertainty in physician communication of prognosis and surrogate goals-of-care decision-making for critically ill patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI).
methodsWe performed a secondary analysis of a previous qualitative study that involved semistructured interviews of 16 surrogates of critically ill patients with TBI from two level 1 trauma centers and 20 TBI expert physicians from seven trauma centers. Open-ended questions about prognostic uncertainty were asked. We identified major themes with an inductive approach. The Conceptual Taxonomy of Uncertainty was applied to further characterize these themes as data-centered, system-centered, and patient-centered issues of uncertainty.
resultsNearly all surrogates (15 of 16) and physicians (19 of 20) recognized the emotional burden of uncertainty in the decision-making process for surrogates. More than three quarters of surrogates (13 of 16) described instances in which a lack of information regarding their loved one's disease or prognosis created uncertainty in their decision-making process, identifying both positive and negative instances of prognostic communication by physicians. We found that physicians used one of three strategies to communicate prognostic uncertainty to surrogates: leaving no room for uncertainty, honesty about uncertainty, and range of possibilities. These strategies did not meet the communication preferences of the majority of surrogates, with more than a third of decision-makers (6 of 15) being frustrated by too much ambiguity about prognosis as well as the failure to acknowledge the existence of uncertainty.
conclusionsWe found that physician communication strategies rarely addressed surrogate needs regarding uncertainty adequately, suggesting an urgent need for future research into improved communication of prognostic uncertainty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34080083What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.