ArticleArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2022
Analysis of the subcapital two-part humerus fracture by fluoroscopy: objective criteria for classification and decision making.
Article in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSurgical decision making in the treatment of proximal humerus fractures (PHFx) is primarily based on fracture classification using standard radiographs. Due to the lack of objective criteria, this classification process is associated with high interobserver variation. In this study, we investigate the fluoroscopic analysis of humerus fractures through the surgical neck using a semi-quantitative determination of distinct angulation patterns of the proximal humerus as they appear in the image intensifier.
methodsUsing a saw bone model, defined subcapital 2-part fracture configurations were generated and assessed radiographically. Anatomical landmarks-including the greater and lesser tuberosity as well as anatomical neck-were identified using an image converter, and the exact degree of fracture displacement with 10° up to 70° (in 10° increments) of posterior, varus or combined posterior-varus angulation was compared to nondisplaced controls. From the resultant series of radiographs, the appearance of these angulations in anteroposterior (AP) and scapular Y-views were also visualized and defined.
resultsAn angulation of 50° or more of any given 2-part fracture through the surgical neck is present when the greater tuberosity becomes the most proximal point in AP view (varus and combined posterior-varus angulation) or a bimodal form is found for the superior contour of the head with the lesser tuberosity being the most proximal point in the Y-view (posterior angulation).
conclusionThe radiological appearance of various PHFx constellations can be well visualized using the saw bone shoulder model. The presence of angulation in accordance with the Neer classification for group III fractures can be adequately determined by analyzing the relative position of the greater or lesser tuberosity to the humeral head calotte. This can assist the surgeon's decision on whether to operate or opt for a conservative approach. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Basic Science, Anatomy Study, Imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.