Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34080054›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2021

Addressing sexual concerns of female breast cancer survivors and partners: a qualitative study of survivors, partners, and oncology providers about Internet intervention preferences.

Kelly M Shaffer, Erin Kennedy, Jillian V Glazer, Anita H Clayton, Wendy Cohn, Trish A Millard, Lee M Ritterband, Shayna Showalter

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kelly M ShafferUVA Cancer Center, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA. kshaffer@virginia.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9749-8006
Erin KennedyUVA Cancer Center, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Jillian V GlazerCenter for Behavioral Health and Technology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, PO Box 801075, Charlottesville, VA, 22908, USA.
Anita H ClaytonPsychiatry and Neurobehavioral Sciences, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Wendy CohnUVA Cancer Center, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Trish A MillardUVA Cancer Center, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Lee M RitterbandUVA Cancer Center, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Shayna ShowalterUVA Cancer Center, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
University of Virginia · US

Funding

The integrated Translational Health Research Institute of Virginia (iTHRIV): Using Data to Improve HealthUL1TR003015 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI BROWN, DONALD E, JOHNSTON, KAREN C. · 2019 to 2023
$20.3M
Institutional Career Development CoreKL2TR003016 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI PAPIN, JASON, WORRALL, BRADFORD B · 2019 to 2023
$3.9M
Interdisciplinary Training in Systems & Biomolecular Data ScienceT32GM145443 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI Kevin A Janes, Jason Papin · 2022 to 2026
$1.5M
National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (US) KL2TR003016NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR003016NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR003015NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR003015NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM145443University of Virginia Cancer Center Cancer Control and Population Health Sciences (CCPH) program Population Research Pilot Projects award
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSexual side effects after breast cancer treatment are common and distressing to both survivors and their intimate partners, yet few receive interventions to address cancer-related sexual concerns. To direct intervention development, this qualitative study assessed the perceptions of female breast cancer survivors, intimate partners of breast cancer survivors, and breast cancer oncology providers about how an Internet intervention for couples may address breast cancer-related sexual concerns.

methodsSurvivors (N = 20) responded to online open-ended surveys. Partners (N = 12) and providers (N = 8) completed individual semi-structured interviews. Data were inductively coded using thematic content analysis.

resultsThree primary intervention content areas were identified by the key stakeholder groups: (1) information about and strategies to manage physical and psychological effects of cancer treatment on sexual health, (2) relationship and communication support, and (3) addressing bodily changes and self-image after treatment. Survivors and partners tended to express interest in some individualized intervention private from their partner, although they also emphasized the importance of opening communication about sexual concerns within the couple. Survivors and partners expressed interest in an intervention that addresses changing needs across the cancer trajectory, available from the time of diagnosis and through survivorship.

conclusionInternet intervention for couples to address cancer-related sexual concerns, particularly one that provides basic education about treatment side effects and that evolves with couples' changing needs across the cancer trajectory, was perceived as a valuable addition to breast cancer care by survivors, partners, and providers.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCancer SurvivorsInternet-Based InterventionFemaleHumansSexual BehaviorSurvivorsBreast neoplasmsCancer survivorsInternet-based interventionQualitative researchSexual dysfunctionSpouses

Identifiers

PMID34080054
PMCPMC8832883
OpenAlexW3164638510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.