Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34080017›Full record

ArticleMutagenesis2022

The hen's egg test for micronucleus induction (HET-MN): validation data set.

Kerstin Reisinger, Dagmar Fieblinger, Andreas Heppenheimer, Jürgen Kreutz, Manfred Liebsch, Andreas Luch, Katrin Maul, Albrecht Poth, Pamela Strauch, Eva Dony and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Mutagenesis, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Kerstin ReisingerHenkel AG & Co KGaA, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Dagmar FieblingerDepartment of Chemical and Product Safety, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Berlin, Germany.
Andreas HeppenheimerICCR-Roßdorf GmbH (formerly Harlan CCR GmbH), Rossdorf, Germany.
Jürgen KreutzHenkel AG & Co KGaA, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Manfred LiebschDepartment of Chemical and Product Safety, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Berlin, Germany.
Andreas LuchDepartment of Chemical and Product Safety, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Berlin, Germany.
Katrin MaulDepartment of Chemical and Product Safety, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Berlin, Germany.
Albrecht PothICCR-Roßdorf GmbH (formerly Harlan CCR GmbH), Rossdorf, Germany.
Pamela StrauchICCR-Roßdorf GmbH (formerly Harlan CCR GmbH), Rossdorf, Germany.
Eva DonyICCR-Roßdorf GmbH (formerly Harlan CCR GmbH), Rossdorf, Germany.
Markus SchulzICCR-Roßdorf GmbH (formerly Harlan CCR GmbH), Rossdorf, Germany.
Thorsten WolfUniversity of Osnabrueck, Osnabrueck, Germany.
Ralph PirowDepartment of Chemical and Product Safety, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The classical in vitro genotoxicity test battery is known to be sensitive for indicating genotoxicity. However, a high rate of 'misleading positives' was reported when three assays were combined as required by several legislations. Despite the recent optimisations of the standard in vitro tests, two gaps could hardly be addressed with assays based on 2D monolayer cell cultures: the route of exposure and a relevant intrinsic metabolic capacity to transform pro-mutagens into reactive metabolites. Following these considerations, fertilised chicken eggs have been introduced into genotoxicity testing and were combined with a classical read-out parameter, the micronucleus frequency in circulating erythrocytes, to develop the hen's egg test for micronucleus induction (HET-MN). As a major advantage, the test mirrors the systemic availability of compounds after oral exposure by reflecting certain steps of Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism, Excretion (ADME) without being considered as an animal experiment. The assay is supposed to add to a toolbox of assays to follow up on positive findings from initial testing with classical in vitro assays. We here report on a validation exercise, in which >30 chemicals were tested double-blinded in three laboratories. The specificity and sensitivity of the HET-MN were calculated to be 98 and 84%, respectively, corresponding to an overall accuracy of 91%. A detailed protocol, which includes a picture atlas detailing the cell and micronuclei analysis, is published in parallel (Maul et al. Validation of the hen's egg test for micronucleus induction (HET-MN): detailed protocol including scoring atlas, historical control data and statistical analysis).

Indexed as

ChickensMutagensAnimalsDNA DamageFemaleMicronucleus TestsMutagenicity TestsMutagens

Identifiers

PMID34080017
PMCPMC9071061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.