Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34079838›Full record

ReviewRobotic surgery (Auckland)2021

Anesthetic Implications of Robotic-Assisted Surgery in Pediatric Patients.

Mayuko Wakimoto, Marc Michalsky, Olubukola Nafiu, Joseph Tobias

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Robotic surgery (Auckland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Mayuko WakimotoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Osaka Police Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Marc MichalskyDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Nationwide Children's Hospital and the Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA.
Olubukola NafiuDepartment of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital and the Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA.
Joseph TobiasDepartment of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital and the Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0550-6951
Nationwide Children's Hospital · USOsaka Police Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The novel technology of robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) has been utilized in children for the past two decades with several potential clinical benefits including reduction of postoperative pain, shortened hospital length of stay, and improved cosmetic outcomes. While associated costs and the limitations regarding instruments for smaller pediatric patients remain relevant issues, surgeon comfort related to ergonomic design in combination with enhanced three-dimensional high-fidelity imaging and tissue handling compared to traditional minimally invasive approached may offer improved surgical and postoperative outcomes. Given that the demand for this innovative technology will likely continue to expand in the field of pediatric surgery, pediatric anesthesiologists will be called upon to provide anesthetic care to patients exposed to this novel surgical technology with its unique features, intraoperative requirements, and potential complications. The current manuscript provides a narrative review of robotic-assisted surgery and discusses important anesthetic considerations and potential complications of these techniques.

Indexed as

minimally invasive surgerypediatric anesthesiologyrobotic-assisted surgery

Identifiers

PMID34079838
PMCPMC8164723
OpenAlexW3164837049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.