ArticleFrontiers in medicine2021
Assessment of the Macular Microvasculature in High Myopes With Swept Source Optical Coherence Tomographic Angiography.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ultra-widefield swept-source OCT angiography assessment of choroidal changes in Chinese myopic adults.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Differences in macular structure and microvasculature between high myopia and non-high myopia.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Optical coherence tomography angiography of the macula of high myopia in children and adolescents.International journal of retina and vitreous · 2024Article
- Ultra-Widefield Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography in the Assessment of Choroidal Changes in Young Adults With Myopia.Translational vision science & technology · 2022Article
- Assessment of the Retinal Vessels in Keratoconus: An OCT Angiography Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- The optical coherence tomography angiography study on paediatric COVID-19 cases.Photodiagnosis and photodynamic therapy · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.