ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2021
Automatic tool segmentation and tracking during robotic intravascular catheterization for cardiac interventions.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- MitraNav: Design and Modeling of a Robotic System for Transseptal Mitral Valve Replacement with Dock Catheter Task-Space Control.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- A knowledge-based framework for robust segmentation of high-resolution impedance manometry catheters in video-fluoroscopy images.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026Article
- Image-Based Medical Navigation Systems for Cardiac Interventions: Recent Technological Advances.Cardiovascular engineering and technology · 2026Review
- Programmable conformal transluminal ablation device for irregular remote small lesions.iScience · 2025Article
- Ultrasound-Guided Real-Time Joint Space Control of a Robotic Transcatheter Delivery System.IEEE robotics and automation letters · 2024Article
- Technical and Clinical Progress on Robot-Assisted Endovascular Interventions: A Review.Micromachines · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCardiovascular diseases resulting from aneurism, thrombosis, and atherosclerosis in the cardiovascular system are major causes of global mortality. Recent treatment methods have been based on catheterization of flexible endovascular tools with imaging guidance. While advances in robotic intravascular catheterization have led to modeling tool navigation approaches with data sensing and feedback, proper adaptation of image-based guidance for robotic navigation requires the development of sensitive segmentation and tracking models without specificity loss. Several methods have been developed to tackle non-uniform illumination, low contrast; however, presence of untargeted body organs commonly found in X-ray frames taken during angiography procedures still presents some major issues to be solved.
methodsIn this study, a segmentation method was developed for automatic detection and tracking of guidewire pixels in X-ray angiograms. Image frames were acquired during robotic intravascular catheterization for cardiac interventions. For segmentation, multiscale enhancement filtering was applied on preprocessed X-ray angiograms, while morphological operations and filters were applied to refine the frames for pixel intensity adjustment and vesselness measurement. Minima and maxima extrema of the pixels were obtained to detect guidewire pixels in the X-ray frames. Lastly, morphological operation was applied for guidewire pixel connectivity and tracking in segmented pixels. Method validation was performed on 12 X-ray angiogram sequences which were acquired during
resultsThe study outcomes showed that an overall accuracy of 0.995±0.001 was achieved for segmentation. Tracking performance was characterized with displacement and orientation errors observed as 1.938±2.429 mm and 0.039±0.040°, respectively. Evaluation studies performed against 9 existing methods revealed that this proposed method provides more accurate segmentation with 0.753±0.074 area under curve. Simultaneously, high tracking accuracy of 0.995±0.001 with low displacement and orientation errors of 1.938±2.429 mm and 0.039±0.040°, respectively, were achieved. Also, the method demonstrated higher sensitivity and specificity values compared to the 9 existing methods, with a relatively faster exaction time.
conclusionsThe proposed method has the capability to enhance robotic intravascular catheterization during percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs). Thus, interventionists can be provided with better tool tracking and visualization systems while also reducing their exposure to operational hazards during intravascular catheterization for cardiac interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.