Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34079734›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2021

Automatic tool segmentation and tracking during robotic intravascular catheterization for cardiac interventions.

Olatunji Mumini Omisore, Wenke Duan, Wenjing Du, Yuhong Zheng, Toluwanimi Akinyemi, Yousef Al-Handerish, Wanghongbo Li, Yong Liu, Jing Xiong, Lei Wang

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Olatunji Mumini OmisoreResearch Centre for Medical Robotics and Minimally Invasive Surgical Devices, Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
Wenke DuanResearch Centre for Medical Robotics and Minimally Invasive Surgical Devices, Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
Wenjing DuResearch Centre for Medical Robotics and Minimally Invasive Surgical Devices, Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
Yuhong ZhengResearch Centre for Medical Robotics and Minimally Invasive Surgical Devices, Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
Toluwanimi AkinyemiResearch Centre for Medical Robotics and Minimally Invasive Surgical Devices, Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
Yousef Al-HanderishResearch Centre for Medical Robotics and Minimally Invasive Surgical Devices, Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
Wanghongbo LiResearch Centre for Medical Robotics and Minimally Invasive Surgical Devices, Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
Yong LiuResearch Centre for Medical Robotics and Minimally Invasive Surgical Devices, Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
Jing XiongResearch Centre for Medical Robotics and Minimally Invasive Surgical Devices, Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
Lei WangResearch Centre for Medical Robotics and Minimally Invasive Surgical Devices, Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology · CNChinese Academy of Sciences · CNUniversity of Chinese Academy of Sciences · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCardiovascular diseases resulting from aneurism, thrombosis, and atherosclerosis in the cardiovascular system are major causes of global mortality. Recent treatment methods have been based on catheterization of flexible endovascular tools with imaging guidance. While advances in robotic intravascular catheterization have led to modeling tool navigation approaches with data sensing and feedback, proper adaptation of image-based guidance for robotic navigation requires the development of sensitive segmentation and tracking models without specificity loss. Several methods have been developed to tackle non-uniform illumination, low contrast; however, presence of untargeted body organs commonly found in X-ray frames taken during angiography procedures still presents some major issues to be solved.

methodsIn this study, a segmentation method was developed for automatic detection and tracking of guidewire pixels in X-ray angiograms. Image frames were acquired during robotic intravascular catheterization for cardiac interventions. For segmentation, multiscale enhancement filtering was applied on preprocessed X-ray angiograms, while morphological operations and filters were applied to refine the frames for pixel intensity adjustment and vesselness measurement. Minima and maxima extrema of the pixels were obtained to detect guidewire pixels in the X-ray frames. Lastly, morphological operation was applied for guidewire pixel connectivity and tracking in segmented pixels. Method validation was performed on 12 X-ray angiogram sequences which were acquired during

resultsThe study outcomes showed that an overall accuracy of 0.995±0.001 was achieved for segmentation. Tracking performance was characterized with displacement and orientation errors observed as 1.938±2.429 mm and 0.039±0.040°, respectively. Evaluation studies performed against 9 existing methods revealed that this proposed method provides more accurate segmentation with 0.753±0.074 area under curve. Simultaneously, high tracking accuracy of 0.995±0.001 with low displacement and orientation errors of 1.938±2.429 mm and 0.039±0.040°, respectively, were achieved. Also, the method demonstrated higher sensitivity and specificity values compared to the 9 existing methods, with a relatively faster exaction time.

conclusionsThe proposed method has the capability to enhance robotic intravascular catheterization during percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs). Thus, interventionists can be provided with better tool tracking and visualization systems while also reducing their exposure to operational hazards during intravascular catheterization for cardiac interventions.

Indexed as

cardiac interventionsGuidewire segmentationintravascular catheterizationminimally invasive surgery (MIS)pixel trackingrobotic catheter systems

Identifiers

PMID34079734
PMCPMC8107332
OpenAlexW3154543883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.