Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34079700›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2021

Detection and recognition of ultrasound breast nodules based on semi-supervised deep learning: a powerful alternative strategy.

Yanhua Gao, Bo Liu, Yuan Zhu, Lin Chen, Miao Tan, Xiaozhou Xiao, Gang Yu, Youmin Guo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Application of deep learning to identify ductal carcinomaQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2022
    Article
  11. The use of deep learning technology for the detection of optic neuropathy.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yanhua GaoDepartment of Medical Imaging, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Bo LiuDepartment of Ultrasound, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital, Xi'an, China.
Yuan ZhuDepartment of Ultrasound, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital, Xi'an, China.
Lin ChenDepartment of Pathology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital, Xi'an, China.
Miao TanDepartment of Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital, Xi'an, China.
Xiaozhou XiaoDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Basic Medical Science, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Gang YuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Basic Medical Science, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Youmin GuoDepartment of Medical Imaging, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe successful recognition of benign and malignant breast nodules using ultrasound images is based mainly on supervised learning that requires a large number of labeled images. However, because high-quality labeling is expensive and time-consuming, we hypothesized that semi-supervised learning could provide a low-cost and powerful alternative approach. This study aimed to develop an accurate semi-supervised recognition method and compared its performance with supervised methods and sonographers.

methodsThe faster region-based convolutional neural network was used for nodule detection from ultrasound images. A semi-supervised classifier based on the mean teacher model was proposed to recognize benign and malignant nodule images. The general performance of the proposed method on two datasets (8,966 nodules) was reported.

resultsThe detection accuracy was 0.88±0.03 and 0.86±0.02, respectively, on two testing sets (1,350 and 2,220 nodules). When 800 labeled training nodules were available, the proposed semi-supervised model plus 4,396 unlabeled nodules performed better than the supervised learning model (area under the curve (AUC): 0.934±0.026

conclusionsThe semi-supervised model can achieve excellent performance for nodule recognition and be useful for medical sciences. The method reduced the number of labeled images required for training, thus significantly alleviating the difficulty in data preparation of medical artificial intelligence.

Indexed as

Deep learningrecognitionsemi-supervised learningultrasound breast nodules

Identifiers

PMID34079700
PMCPMC8107344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.