Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34079633›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of blood research2021

Association of Hematologic biomarkers and their combinations with disease severity and mortality in COVID-19- an Indian perspective.

Mukta Pujani, Sujata Raychaudhuri, Nikhil Verma, Harnam Kaur, Shivani Agarwal, Mitasha Singh, Manjula Jain, R K Chandoke, Kanika Singh, Dipti Sidam and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of blood research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mukta PujaniDepartment of Pathology, ESIC Medical College & Hospital Faridabad, India.
Sujata RaychaudhuriDepartment of Pathology, ESIC Medical College & Hospital Faridabad, India.
Nikhil VermaDepartment of Medicine, ESIC Medical College & Hospital Faridabad, India.
Harnam KaurDepartment of Biochemistry, ESIC Medical College & Hospital Faridabad, India.
Shivani AgarwalDepartment of Physiology, ESIC Medical College & Hospital Faridabad, India.
Mitasha SinghDepartment of Community Medicine, ESIC Medical College & Hospital Faridabad, India.
Manjula JainDepartment of Pathology, ESIC Medical College & Hospital Faridabad, India.
R K ChandokeDepartment of Pathology, ESIC Medical College & Hospital Faridabad, India.
Kanika SinghDepartment of Pathology, ESIC Medical College & Hospital Faridabad, India.
Dipti SidamDepartment of Pathology, ESIC Medical College & Hospital Faridabad, India.
Varsha ChauhanDepartment of Pathology, ESIC Medical College & Hospital Faridabad, India.
Aparna SinghDepartment of Pathology, ESIC Medical College & Hospital Faridabad, India.
Khushbu KataryaDepartment of Pathology, ESIC Medical College & Hospital Faridabad, India.
ESIC Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCOVID-19 is a systemic viral infection with a significant impact on the hematopoietic system, hemostasis as well as immune system. It would be of utmost importance to explore if the most routinely used tests could serve as an aid in determining patient's clinical status or predicting severity of the disease.

methodsA prospective cross-sectional study was conducted on 506 Covid-19 positive patients and 200 controls over a period of two months (June and July 2020). The cases were sub-classified based on disease severity into mild to moderate (n=337), severe (n=118) and very severe (n=51) and based on survivor status into survivors (n=473) and non-survivors (n=33).

resultsThere were statistically significant differences in WBC count, Absolute neutrophil count (ANC), Absolute lymphocyte count (ALC), absolute monocyte count (AMC), neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), monocyte-lymphocyte ratio (MLR) Red blood cell distribution width (RDW-SD) and RDW CV between covid cases vs controls; among the clinical subgroups and among the survivors and non-survivors. There was a significant strong positive correlation between various parameters, that is, NLR and MLR (r: 0.852, P=0), MPV and PDW (r: 0.912, P=0), MPV and PLCR (r: 0.956, P=0), PDW and PLCR (r: 0.893, P=0). NLR (AUC: 0.676, P=0) was the best single parameter and NLR+RDW-CV was best combination parameter as per area under curve (0.871) of ROC to distinguish severe from mild to moderate disease.

conclusionsLeucocytosis, neutrophilia, lymphopenia and monocytosis were characteristic findings in covid cases while NLR and NLR+RDW-CV emerged as the most effective single and combination CBC parameters in distinguishing mild to moderate and severe cases respectively.

Indexed as

COVID-19hematological indicesMLRNLRPLRRDW-CVRDW-SD

Identifiers

PMID34079633
PMCPMC8165721
OpenAlexW3165714649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.