Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34079531›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2021

Effects of Gallic Acid on Fermentation Parameters, Protein Fraction, and Bacterial Community of Whole Plant Soybean Silage.

Cheng Wang, Mingyang Zheng, Shuo Wu, Xuan Zou, Xiaoyang Chen, Liangfa Ge, Qing Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Impact ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  7. Effects ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Utilisation ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Effects ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Effects of antibacterial peptide-producingFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Cheng WangCollege of Forestry and Landscape Architecture, Guangdong Province Research Center of Woody Forage Engineering Technology, Guangdong Research and Development Center of Modern Agriculture (Woody Forage) Industrial Technology, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Mingyang ZhengCollege of Forestry and Landscape Architecture, Guangdong Province Research Center of Woody Forage Engineering Technology, Guangdong Research and Development Center of Modern Agriculture (Woody Forage) Industrial Technology, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Shuo WuCollege of Forestry and Landscape Architecture, Guangdong Province Research Center of Woody Forage Engineering Technology, Guangdong Research and Development Center of Modern Agriculture (Woody Forage) Industrial Technology, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Xuan ZouCollege of Forestry and Landscape Architecture, Guangdong Province Research Center of Woody Forage Engineering Technology, Guangdong Research and Development Center of Modern Agriculture (Woody Forage) Industrial Technology, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Xiaoyang ChenCollege of Forestry and Landscape Architecture, Guangdong Province Research Center of Woody Forage Engineering Technology, Guangdong Research and Development Center of Modern Agriculture (Woody Forage) Industrial Technology, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Liangfa GeCollege of Forestry and Landscape Architecture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Qing ZhangCollege of Forestry and Landscape Architecture, Guangdong Province Research Center of Woody Forage Engineering Technology, Guangdong Research and Development Center of Modern Agriculture (Woody Forage) Industrial Technology, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
South China Agricultural University · CNState Key Laboratory For Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-Bioresources

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Whole plant soybean (WPS) is a kind of legume resource with characteristics of high nutrition, large biomass, and wide distribution. In the present study, we have investigated the feasibility and effects of gallic acid (GA) on WPS silage quality, nitrogen distribution, tannin content, and bacterial community. The 0.5 and 1% (fresh matter basis) GA were added into WPS for dynamic ensiling (days 3, 7, 14, and 30, respectively). The results showed that the WPS silage with GA addition significantly decreased pH value (6.16-5.38 at ensiling day 30), coliform bacteria count and butyric acid (65.3-62.0 g/kg dry matter at ensiling day 30), and amino nitrogen contents (259-88.2 g/kg total nitrogen at ensiling day 30) and promoted lactic acid (9.62-31.5 g/kg dry matter at ensiling day 30), acetic acid (24.1-85.6 g/kg dry matter at ensiling day 30), and tannin (total phenol and hydrolyzable tannin) contents. Additionally, the GA addition also contributed to the change of bacterial community, where

Indexed as

bacterial communityfermentation qualitygallic acidprotein fractionwhole plant soybean

Identifiers

PMID34079531
PMCPMC8165322
OpenAlexW3162780760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.