Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34079516›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neurology2021

Therapy of Pediatric-Onset Multiple Sclerosis: State of the Art, Challenges, and Opportunities.

Monica Margoni, Francesca Rinaldi, Paola Perini, Paolo Gallo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neurology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A multicentre, prospective, randomized, open-label pragmatic trial to compare the effectiveness and safety of interferon beta-1a and glatiramer-acetate in paediatric patients affected by Multiple Sclerosis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Identifying Cladribine prescription pattern in MS: an Italian multicentre study.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Monica MargoniMultiple Sclerosis Centre of the Veneto Region (CeSMuV), University Hospital of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Francesca RinaldiMultiple Sclerosis Centre of the Veneto Region (CeSMuV), University Hospital of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Paola PeriniMultiple Sclerosis Centre of the Veneto Region (CeSMuV), University Hospital of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Paolo GalloMultiple Sclerosis Centre of the Veneto Region (CeSMuV), University Hospital of Padua, Padua, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Treatment of pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis (POMS) has been tailored after observational studies and data obtained from clinical trials in adult-onset multiple sclerosis (AOMS) patients. There are an increasing number of new therapeutic agents for AOMS, and many will be formally studied for use also in POMS. However, there are important efficacy and safety concerns regarding the use of these therapies in children and young adults. This review will discuss the current state of the art of POMS therapy and will focus on the newer therapies (oral and infusion disease-modifying drugs) and on those still currently under investigation.

Indexed as

efficacyfirst-line therapiespediatric onset multiple sclerosissafetysecond-line therapies

Identifiers

PMID34079516
PMCPMC8165183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.