Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34079399›Full record

ArticleRisk management and healthcare policy2021

Knowledge, Attitudes, Practices, and Related Factors Towards COVID-19 Prevention Among Patients at University Medical Center Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.

Hoang Bac Nguyen, Thi Hong Minh Nguyen, Thi Thanh Tam Tran, Thi Hong Nhan Vo, Van Hung Tran, Thi Nam Phuong Do, Quang Binh Truong, Thi Hiep Nguyen, Loan Khanh Ly

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Risk management and healthcare policy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Hoang Bac NguyenUniversity Medical Center Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, 700000, Vietnam.ORCID 0000-0002-2973-7909
Thi Hong Minh NguyenUniversity Medical Center Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, 700000, Vietnam.ORCID 0000-0002-4279-1248
Thi Thanh Tam TranUniversity Medical Center Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, 700000, Vietnam.ORCID 0000-0002-3872-1570
Thi Hong Nhan VoUniversity Medical Center Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, 700000, Vietnam.ORCID 0000-0002-0146-5729
Van Hung TranUniversity Medical Center Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, 700000, Vietnam.
Thi Nam Phuong DoUniversity Medical Center Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, 700000, Vietnam.
Quang Binh TruongUniversity Medical Center Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, 700000, Vietnam.ORCID 0000-0003-4973-6919
Thi Hiep NguyenTissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine Department, School of Biomedical Engineering, International University, Ho Chi Minh City, 700000, Vietnam.ORCID 0000-0002-1636-7152
Loan Khanh LyTissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine Department, School of Biomedical Engineering, International University, Ho Chi Minh City, 700000, Vietnam.ORCID 0000-0002-6868-8994

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThis study measured the level of knowledge, attitudes and practices towards COVID-19 prevention and examined associated factors among patients at a national tertiary general hospital in Vietnam.

methodsAdult patients admitted to University Medical Center during research period were recruited in a cross-sectional study, which employed a convenience sampling method with a 4-component questionnaire in order to examine the patients' consciousness towards COVID-19 spreading prevention based on four aspects: demographic characteristics (10 items), knowledge (14 items), attitudes (6 items), and practices (7 items).

resultsThe study involved 2769 respondents (18-90 years) with the mean age of 38.05±13.91 years. About two thirds of the respondents obtained diploma degree or higher (63.4%) and shared their living space with others (64.4%). The majority of patients settled in urban area (74.9%). All participants stayed informed about COVID-19, with the most commonly used channels like television (75.2%), the Internet (72.2%) and phone (69.8%). The vast majority showed sufficient knowledge (93.7%) and positive attitudes (76.3%). Just over half of participants remained good practiced of COVID-19 prevention (57.7%). On average, the factors of younger age, higher educational level, frequency and department of admission, and the number of COVID-19 informative channels were significantly associated with sufficient knowledge, positive attitudes, and good practices regarding preventive action against COVID-19 spreading. The optimistic attitude and having more undergoing chronic diseases were associated with the likelihood of well-practiced COVID-19 preventive measures (OR 3.63, 95% CI 1.54-8.55, p=0.003 and OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.78-0.98, p=0.02, respectively).

conclusionThe results of this study demonstrated that the likelihood of good preventive practices in the fight against COVID-19 pandemic was influenced by attitudes and several sociodemographic factors. More drastic interventions for the prevention of COVID-19 should be widely furnished and equipped in hospitals, through various routes to maximize the efficiency and adherence to prevention practices.

Indexed as

attitudesCOVID-19 preventionknowledgepatientspracticesVietnam

Identifiers

PMID34079399
PMCPMC8163721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.