Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34079336›Full record

ArticlePharmacogenomics and personalized medicine2021

Ferroptosis-Related Gene Signature: A New Method for Personalized Risk Assessment in Patients with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.

Huan Chen, Yizi He, Tao Pan, Ruolan Zeng, Yajun Li, Siwei Chen, Yufeng Li, Ling Xiao, Hui Zhou

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmacogenomics and personalized medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Huan Chen *Department of Lymphoma & Hematology, Hunan Cancer Hospital, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, People's Republic of China.
Yizi He *Department of Lymphoma & Hematology, Hunan Cancer Hospital, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, People's Republic of China.
Tao PanDepartment of Lymphoma & Hematology, Hunan Cancer Hospital, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, People's Republic of China.
Ruolan ZengDepartment of Lymphoma & Hematology, Hunan Cancer Hospital, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, People's Republic of China.
Yajun LiDepartment of Lymphoma & Hematology, Hunan Cancer Hospital, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, People's Republic of China.
Siwei ChenDepartment of Histology and Embryology of School of Basic Medical Science, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, People's Republic of China.
Yufeng LiDepartment of Histology and Embryology of School of Basic Medical Science, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, People's Republic of China.
Ling XiaoDepartment of Histology and Embryology of School of Basic Medical Science, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, People's Republic of China.
Hui ZhouDepartment of Lymphoma & Hematology, Hunan Cancer Hospital, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, People's Republic of China.
Central South University · CNHunan Cancer Hospital · CNChangsha Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDiffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a genetically heterogeneous disease, which makes prognostic prediction challenging. The rapid development of research on ferroptosis provides the possibility of its use in prognosis in cancer patients. The aim of the current investigation was to perform a systematic study of ferroptosis and DLBCL prognosis to identify prognostic biomarkers in DLBCL. MATERIALS AND

methodsA total of 884 DLBCL patients from the Gene Expression Omnibus database were included in this study and were divided into a training set and a validation set. Univariate Cox regression analysis was used to investigate relationships between gene expression and prognostic values. Ferroptosis-related genes associated with overall survival in the training set were then extracted, and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator Cox regression model was used to establish an eight-gene signature, comprising ZEB1, PSAT1, NGB, NFE2L2, LAMP2, HIF1A, FH, and CXCL2.

resultsThe signature exhibited significant independent prognostic value in both the training set and the validation set. It also exhibited strong prognostic value in subgroup analysis. A nomogram integrating the eight-gene signature and components of the International Prognostic Index facilitated reliable prognostic prediction.

conclusionA novel and reliable ferroptosis-related gene signature that can effectively classify DLBCL patients into high-risk and low-risk groups in terms of survival rate was developed. It could be used for prognostic prediction in DLBCL patients. Targeting ferroptosis may be a therapeutic alternative in DLBCL.

Indexed as

diffuse large B-cell lymphomaferroptosisGene Expression Omnibus databaseprognosticsignature

Identifiers

PMID34079336
PMCPMC8165657
OpenAlexW3164550423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.