Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34079324›Full record

Trial reportClinical and experimental gastroenterology2021

Comparison of Lidocaine Spray and Lidocaine Ice Popsicle in Patients Undergoing Unsedated Esophagogastroduodenoscopy: A Single Center Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

Prasit Mahawongkajit, Nantawat Talalak, Neranchala Soonthornkes

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readCase ReportsClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical and experimental gastroenterology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06220175 (Pharynx Analgesia Before Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06220175 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Pharynx Analgesia Before Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: a Prospective, Randomized Comparative Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorCarol Davila University of Medicine and PharmacyRan2024 to 2024Enrolled37ConditionsUpper Gastrointestinal EndoscopyArmsStrepsils Intensiv plus Xilocaine spray Arm, Xilocaine Spray Arm
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Exploring the Role of Amitriptyline in Modulating Gag Reflex Sensitivity.Iranian journal of pharmaceutical research : IJPR
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Prasit MahawongkajitDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University, Pathumthani, 12120, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-6144-2572
Nantawat TalalakDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University, Pathumthani, 12120, Thailand.
Neranchala SoonthornkesDepartment of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University, Pathumthani, 12120, Thailand.
Thammasat University · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEsophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) under topical pharyngeal anesthesia has the advantage of avoiding the unwanted cardiopulmonary adverse events experienced following intravenous sedation. Lidocaine spray is a common anesthetic option and is safe for unsedated EGD. Although several studies have compared different topical anesthetic agents, their formulations, and delivery techniques, questions still remain concerning the optimal mode of administration. We have designed a lidocaine formulation in the form of an ice popsicle and compared its effectiveness and tolerability with lidocaine spray in patients undergoing unsedated EGD.

methodsThis was a single-center prospective randomized controlled trial. Unsedated EGD patients were randomly allocated the lidocaine spray [Group (Gp) A] or lidocaine ice popsicle (Gp B) formulation.

resultsIn total, 204 unsedated EGD patients were evaluated. Compared to the spray, the lidocaine ice popsicle group showed better scores for effects in terms of endoscopist satisfaction (Gp A, 7.28±1.44; Gp B, 7.8±0.89; p=0.0022), gag reflex (Gp A, 1.3±0.66; Gp B, 1.02±0.61; p=0.0016), patient satisfaction (Gp A, 7.74±0.82; Gp B, 8.08±0.82; p=0.0039), discomfort (Gp A, 6.54±1.34; Gp B, 5.95±1.21; p=0.0012), and pain (Gp A, 5.38±1.85; Gp B, 4.51±2.01; p=0.0015).

conclusionBoth the lidocaine spray and ice popsicle formulations are safe, effective options for diagnostic EGD with the ice popsicle exhibiting better performance. We propose the lidocaine ice popsicle formulation for topical pharyngeal anesthesia in patients undergoing unsedated diagnostic EGD and suggest it may be a suitable option during the COVID-19 pandemic. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTER: Thai Clinical Trials Registry (TCTR) number TCTR20190502001.

Indexed as

esophagogastroduodenoscopylidocaine ice popsiclelidocaine spraytopical pharyngeal anesthesiaupper gastrointestinal endoscopy

Identifiers

PMID34079324
PMCPMC8164666
OpenAlexW3164888554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.