Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34079257›Full record

ReviewNeuropsychiatric disease and treatment2021

Assessment of the Impact of Tardive Dyskinesia in Clinical Practice: Consensus Panel Recommendations.

Richard Jackson, Matthew N Brams, Leslie Citrome, Amber R Hoberg, Stuart H Isaacson, John M Kane, Rajeev Kumar

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of tardive dyskinesia in Europe: A descriptive review.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Telehealth for Assessing and Managing Tardive Dyskinesia: Expert Insights from a Cross-Disciplinary Virtual Treatment Panel.Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association · 2023
    Article
  14. Pathophysiology, prognosis and treatment of tardive dyskinesia.Therapeutic advances in psychopharmacology · 2022
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Richard JacksonUniversity of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Matthew N BramsBaylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Leslie CitromeNew York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6098-9266
Amber R HobergGeroPsych Associates of Central Texas, Austin, TX, USA.
Stuart H IsaacsonParkinson's Disease and Movement Disorders Center of Boca Raton, Boca Raton, FL, USA.
John M KaneFeinstein Institution for Medical Research, Lynbrook, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2628-9442
Rajeev KumarRocky Mountain Movement Disorders Center, Englewood, CO, USA.
Baylor College of Medicine · USFeinstein Institute for Medical Research · USNew York Medical College · USParkinson's Research and Education Foundation · USRocky Mountain MS Center · USUniversity of Michigan · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTardive dyskinesia (TD) is a hyperkinetic movement disorder in which patients experience abnormal involuntary movements that can have profound negative impacts on physical, cognitive, and psychosocial functioning. Use of measures to assess the functional impact of TD in routine clinical practice is lacking. To address this gap, an advisory panel of experts in psychiatry and movement disorder neurology was convened to develop consensus recommendations on assessment of the impact of TD on patients' functioning that can be used in clinical practice.

methodsAn advisory panel provided recommendations using an iterative process, beginning with a narrative literature review regarding current practices for assessing the impact of TD in clinical settings. A detailed summary was generated, and the advisory panel provided comments about the content and answered questions about assessing TD impact in clinical practice. The panelists' responses were discussed during a virtual meeting held on August 28, 2020. A second meeting on September 25, 2020, focused on developing and refining recommendations for assessment of the impact of TD in clinical practice. At the conclusion of the second meeting, general consensus was reached on all recommendation statements.

resultsAs part of routine clinical practice, it is imperative to assess the impact of TD on the patient's life to help guide treatment decisions. Key domains for assessing the overall impact of TD include social, physical, vocational, and psychological functioning and the impact of TD on the underlying psychiatric disorder. Assessment of TD impact should be performed at every patient visit. Impact assessments should include consultation with patients, caregivers, and family members. Shared decision-making to initiate TD treatment should consider impact.

conclusionThe impact of TD should be assessed routinely, including the key domains of social, physical, vocational, and psychological functioning and the impact of TD on the underlying psychiatric disorder.

Indexed as

diagnosisfunctional domainshyperkinetic movementtreatment

Identifiers

PMID34079257
PMCPMC8164384
OpenAlexW3165386205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.