Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34079240›Full record

SynthesisClinical interventions in aging2021

Dementia Enlightened?! A Systematic Literature Review of the Influence of Indoor Environmental Light on the Health of Older Persons with Dementia in Long-Term Care Facilities.

Ingrid Goudriaan, Leonieke C van Boekel, Marjolein E A Verbiest, Joost van Hoof, Katrien G Luijkx

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical interventions in aging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ingrid GoudriaanTranzo, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University, Tilburg, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0405-5514
Leonieke C van BoekelTranzo, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University, Tilburg, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4133-8396
Marjolein E A VerbiestTranzo, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University, Tilburg, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3731-5295
Joost van HoofChair of Urban Ageing, Faculty of Social Work & Education, The Hague University of Applied Sciences, The Hague, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9704-7128
Katrien G LuijkxTranzo, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University, Tilburg, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1856-3819
Tilburg University · NLWrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Light therapy for older persons with dementia is often administered with light boxes, even though indoor ambient light may more comfortably support the diverse lighting needs of this population. Our objective is to investigate the influence of indoor daylight and lighting on the health of older adults with dementia living in long-term care facilities. A systematic literature search was performed within PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science and Scopus databases. The included articles (n=37) were published from 1991 to 2020. These articles researched the influence of existing and changed indoor light conditions on health and resulted in seven categories of health outcomes. Although no conclusive evidence was found to support the ability of indoor light to decrease challenging behaviors or improve circadian rhythms, findings of two studies indicate that exposure to (very) cool light of moderate intensity diminished agitation. Promising effects of indoor light were to reduce depressive symptoms and facilitate spatial orientation. Furthermore, there were indications that indoor light improved one's quality of life. Despite interventions with dynamic lighting having yielded little evidence of its efficacy, its potential has been insufficiently researched among this study population. This review provides a clear and comprehensive description of the impact of diverse indoor light conditions on the health of older adults with dementia living in long-term care facilities. Variation was seen in terms of research methods, (the description of) light conditions, and participants' characteristics (types and severity of dementia), thus confounding the reliability of the findings. The authors recommend further research to corroborate the beneficial effects of indoor light on depression and to clarify its role in supporting everyday activities of this population. An implication for practice in long-term care facilities is raising the awareness of the increased lighting needs of aged residents.

Indexed as

Circadian RhythmSunlightAgedAged, 80 and overDementiaHumansLong-Term CareMaleNursing HomesPhototherapyQuality of LifeReproducibility of ResultsSkilled Nursing FacilitiesAlzheimer’s diseaseassisted livingindoor daylightlightinglight therapynursing homes

Identifiers

PMID34079240
PMCPMC8163627
OpenAlexW3164912248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.