Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34079183›Full record

ArticleAnnals of dermatology2021

Participants' Satisfaction with the Atopic Dermatitis Education Program: Assessing the Impact of Each Content Using Structural Equation Modeling.

Ji Hoon Ryoo, Seon Hwa Lee, Hyun Ji Lee, Joonsoo Park, Sung-Ae Kim, Young Wook Ryoo, Dong Hoon Shin, Moo Kyu Suh, Jun Young Kim, Kyung Duck Park and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of dermatology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Ji Hoon RyooDepartment of Education, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7546-6911
Seon Hwa LeeDepartment of Dermatology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4178-8968
Hyun Ji LeeDepartment of Dermatology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4222-1835
Joonsoo ParkDepartment of Dermatology, School of Medicine, Catholic University of Daegu, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1354-2311
Sung-Ae KimDepartment of Dermatology, School of Medicine, Keimyung University, Daegu, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6040-6630
Young Wook RyooDepartment of Dermatology, School of Medicine, Keimyung University, Daegu, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2477-6263
Dong Hoon ShinDepartment of Dermatology, College of Medicine, Yeungnam University, Daegu, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3130-3699
Moo Kyu SuhDepartment of Dermatology, College of Medicine, Dongguk University, Gyeongju, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7629-8363
Jun Young KimDepartment of Dermatology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2999-1018
Kyung Duck ParkDepartment of Dermatology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6067-7262
Weon Ju LeeDepartment of Dermatology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5708-1305
Seok-Jong LeeDepartment of Dermatology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6131-632X
Do Won KimDepartment of Dermatology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6632-1374
Yong Hyun JangDepartment of Dermatology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1706-007X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOnly a few studies have tried to assess factors relevant to the satisfaction of the participants in atopic dermatitis (AD) educational programs. More systematic modeling of this issue is needed.

objectiveTo examine the benefit of a conjoint educational program for AD on patients and caregivers in a clinical setting.

methodsIn a half-day educational program called "AD school", 831 people (493 patients and 338 family members) participated for 8 years. Various educational and entertaining programs were provided. The on-site survey was administered to measure participants' satisfaction and perception of the benefit. We applied structural equation modeling to identify the relations among satisfaction and perception.

resultsA total of 209 family survey data was obtained and analyzed. The survey items were grouped into four categories. The categories were classified as individual education, group education, fun activity, and overall satisfaction (fun, benefit, intention to re-join and recommend to others). According to the model that we built, comprehensive group education was demonstrated to be the most relevant factor affecting overall satisfaction.

conclusionOur holistic approach would allow dermatologists to improve the efficacy of the conjoint educational program for AD.

Indexed as

Atopic dermatitisEducationSatisfaction

Identifiers

PMID34079183
PMCPMC8137320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.