ArticleScientific reports2021
Recanalisation theraphy for acute ischemic stroke in cancer patients.
Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systemic thrombolysis in patients with acute stroke and active cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Internal and emergency medicine · 2023Pooled it
- Recanalization therapy in stroke patients with malignancies: in-hospital outcomes by cancer subtype in a nationwide administrative data analysis.Journal of neurology · 2026Article
- Mechanical Thrombectomy in Patients with Malignancy: Comparable Procedural Success but Less Favorable Long-Term Outcomes.Brain sciences · 2026Article
- Intravenous thrombolysis in patients with acute ischaemic stroke and active cancer (the ITACA-stroke study).Journal of neurology · 2025Observational
- Intravenous thrombolysis in the context of stroke and cancer.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2025Review
- Endovascular treatment in ischemic stroke with active cancer: retrospective analysis of university stroke center data.Neurological research and practice · 2025Article
- Outcomes of Mechanical Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke in Cancer Patients: A Single-Center Experience and Meta-Analysis.Neurology. Clinical practice · 2024Article
- Long-term outcomes of mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischaemic stroke patients with concomitant malignancy.Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology · 2024Article
- A risk model for prediction of diagnosis of cancer after ischemic stroke.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Endovascular treatment in patients with acute ischemic stroke and cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis.European stroke journal · 2022Review
- Mechanical Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke in Patients with Malignancy: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Beyond the coagulopathy phenotype in cancer-associated stroke: routine radiology report-based phenotyping and a practical diagnostic prioritization.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To date, very few studies focused their attention on efficacy and safety of recanalisation therapy in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with cancer, reporting conflicting results. We retrospectively analysed data from our database of consecutive patients admitted to the Udine University Hospital with AIS that were treated with recanalisation therapy, i.e. intravenous thrombolysis (IVT), mechanical thrombectomy (MT), and bridging therapy, from January 2015 to December 2019. We compared 3-month dependency, 3-month mortality, and symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage (SICH) occurrence of patients with active cancer (AC) and remote cancer (RC) with that of patients without cancer (WC) undergoing recanalisation therapy for AIS. Patients were followed up for 3 months. Among the 613 AIS patients included in the study, 79 patients (12.9%) had either AC (n = 46; 7.5%) or RC (n = 33; 5.4%). Although AC patients, when treated with IVT, had a significantly increased risk of 3-month mortality [odds ratio (OR) 6.97, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.42-20.07, p = 0.001] than WC patients, stroke-related deaths did not differ between AC and WC patients (30% vs. 28.8%, p = 0.939). There were no significant differences between AC and WC patients, when treated with MT ± IVT, regarding 3-month dependency, 3-month mortality and SICH. Functional independence, mortality, and SICH were similar between RC and WC patients. In conclusion, recanalisation therapy might be used in AIS patients with nonmetastatic AC and with RC. Further studies are needed to explore the outcome of AIS patients with metastatic cancer undergoing recanalisation therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.