Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34079015›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Recanalisation theraphy for acute ischemic stroke in cancer patients.

Giovanni Merlino, Carmelo Smeralda, Gian Luigi Gigli, Simone Lorenzut, Sara Pez, Andrea Surcinelli, Alessandro Marini, Valentina Maniaci, Mariarosaria Valente

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Intravenous thrombolysis in the context of stroke and cancer.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Long-term outcomes of mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischaemic stroke patients with concomitant malignancy.Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Giovanni Merlino *Stroke Unit and Clinical Neurology, Department of Neuroscience, Udine University Hospital, Piazzale S. Maria della Misericordia 15, 33100, Udine, Italy. giovanni.merlino@asufc.sanita.fvg.it.
Carmelo Smeralda *Clinical Neurology, Udine University Hospital, Udine, Italy.
Gian Luigi GigliClinical Neurology, Udine University Hospital, Udine, Italy.
Simone LorenzutStroke Unit and Clinical Neurology, Department of Neuroscience, Udine University Hospital, Piazzale S. Maria della Misericordia 15, 33100, Udine, Italy.
Sara PezClinical Neurology, Udine University Hospital, Udine, Italy.
Andrea SurcinelliClinical Neurology, Udine University Hospital, Udine, Italy.
Alessandro MariniClinical Neurology, Udine University Hospital, Udine, Italy.
Valentina ManiaciOncology Unit, Monfalcone Hospital, Monfalcone, Italy.
Mariarosaria ValenteClinical Neurology, Udine University Hospital, Udine, Italy.
University of Udine · ITOspedale di Monfalcone · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To date, very few studies focused their attention on efficacy and safety of recanalisation therapy in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with cancer, reporting conflicting results. We retrospectively analysed data from our database of consecutive patients admitted to the Udine University Hospital with AIS that were treated with recanalisation therapy, i.e. intravenous thrombolysis (IVT), mechanical thrombectomy (MT), and bridging therapy, from January 2015 to December 2019. We compared 3-month dependency, 3-month mortality, and symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage (SICH) occurrence of patients with active cancer (AC) and remote cancer (RC) with that of patients without cancer (WC) undergoing recanalisation therapy for AIS. Patients were followed up for 3 months. Among the 613 AIS patients included in the study, 79 patients (12.9%) had either AC (n = 46; 7.5%) or RC (n = 33; 5.4%). Although AC patients, when treated with IVT, had a significantly increased risk of 3-month mortality [odds ratio (OR) 6.97, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.42-20.07, p = 0.001] than WC patients, stroke-related deaths did not differ between AC and WC patients (30% vs. 28.8%, p = 0.939). There were no significant differences between AC and WC patients, when treated with MT ± IVT, regarding 3-month dependency, 3-month mortality and SICH. Functional independence, mortality, and SICH were similar between RC and WC patients. In conclusion, recanalisation therapy might be used in AIS patients with nonmetastatic AC and with RC. Further studies are needed to explore the outcome of AIS patients with metastatic cancer undergoing recanalisation therapy.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overBlood PressureFemaleHeart RateHumansIntracranial HemorrhagesIschemic StrokeMaleMechanical ThrombolysisNeoplasmsRetrospective StudiesSurvival AnalysisThrombectomyTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID34079015
PMCPMC8172643
OpenAlexW3165442865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.