Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34079005›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Expedient assessment of post-infarct remodeling by native cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in mice.

Cajetan Immanuel Lang, Praveen Vasudevan, Piet Döring, Ralf Gäbel, Heiko Lemcke, Tobias Lindner, Gustav Steinhoff, Bernd Joachim Krause, Brigitte Vollmar, Felix G Meinel and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Detection of apoptosis by [Annals of nuclear medicine · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Cajetan Immanuel LangDepartment of Cardiology, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany. cajetan.lang@med.uni-rostock.de.
Praveen VasudevanDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.
Piet DöringDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.
Ralf GäbelDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.
Heiko LemckeDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.
Tobias LindnerCore Facility Multimodal Small Animal Imaging, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.
Gustav SteinhoffDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.
Bernd Joachim KrauseDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.
Brigitte VollmarRudolf-Zenker-Institute for Experimental Surgery, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.
Felix G MeinelInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.
Seyrani YücelDepartment of Cardiology, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.
Alper ÖnerDepartment of Cardiology, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.
Hüseyin InceDepartment of Cardiology, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.
Robert DavidDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.
University of Rostock · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Novel therapeutic strategies aiming at improving the healing process after an acute myocardial infarction are currently under intense investigation. The mouse model plays a central role for deciphering the underlying mechanisms on a molecular and cellular level. Therefore, we intended to assess in-vivo post-infarct remodeling as comprehensively as possible using an expedient native magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the two most prominent infarct models, permanent ligation (PL) of the left anterior descending artery (LAD) versus ischemia reperfusion (I/R). Mice were subjected to either permanent or transient (45 min) occlusion of the LAD. After 3 weeks, examinations were performed with a 7-Tesla small animal MRI system. Data analysis was performed with the freely available software Segment. PL resulted in a massive dilation of the left ventricle, accompanied by hypertrophy of the non-infarcted myocardium and a decline of contractile function. These effects were less pronounced following I/R compared to healthy animals. Single plane assessments were not sufficient to capture the specific differences of left ventricular (LV) properties between the two infarct models. Bulls-eye plots were found to be an ideal tool for qualitative LV wall assessment, whereas a multi-slice sector-based analysis of wall regions is ideal to determine differences in hypertrophy, lateral wall thinning and wall thickening on a quantitative level. We combine the use of polar map-based analysis of LV wall properties with volumetric measurements using simple CINE CMR imaging. Our strategy represents a versatile and easily available tool for serial assessment of the LV during the remodeling process. Our study contributes to a better understanding of the effects of novel therapies targeting the healing of damaged myocardium.

Indexed as

AnimalsCerebrovascular DisordersDisease Models, AnimalHeartHeart VentriclesInfarction, Anterior Cerebral ArteryLigationMagnetic Resonance Imaging, CineMiceMyocardial InfarctionReperfusion InjuryTime FactorsVentricular Remodeling

Identifiers

PMID34079005
PMCPMC8172884
OpenAlexW3165366127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.