ArticleScientific reports2021
Development of a reference standard for the detection and quantification of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis by quantitative PCR.
Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Crohn's Disease in Malaysia: Could Application of the Precautionary Principle Reduce Future Incidence?Microorganisms · 2026Review
- The Development of 3D Bovine Intestinal Organoid Derived Models to InvestigateFrontiers in veterinary science · 2022Article
- Evaluation of a droplet digital PCR assay for quantification ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2022Article
- Isothermal inactivation ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Warm, Sweetened Milk at the Twilight of Immunity - Alzheimer's Disease - Inflammaging, Insulin Resistance,Frontiers in immunology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Quantitative PCR (qPCR) has become a frequently employed direct method for the detection and quantification of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis (MAP). The quantity of MAP determined by qPCR, however, may be affected by the type of qPCR quantification standard used (PCR product, plasmid, genomic DNA) and the way in which standard DNA quantity is determined (absorbance, fluorescence). In practice, this can be reflected in the inability to properly compare quantitative data from the same qPCR assays in different laboratories. Thus, the aim of this study was to prepare a prototype of an international MAP reference standard, which could be used to calibrate routinely used qPCR quantification standards in various laboratories to promote clinical data comparability. Considering stability, storage and shipment issues, a lyophilised fecal suspension artificially contaminated with a MAP reference strain was chosen as the most suitable form of the standard. The effect of five types of lyophilisation matrices on standard stability was monitored on 2-weeks interval basis for 4 months by F57 qPCR. The lyophilisation matrix with 10% skimmed milk provided the best recovery and stability in time and was thus selected for subsequent comparative testing of the standard involving six diagnostic and research laboratories, where DNA isolation and qPCR assay procedures were performed with the parallel use of the identical supplied genomic DNA solution. Furthermore, the effect of storage conditions on the standard stability was tested for at least 6 months. The storage at room temperature in the dark and under light, at + 4 °C, - 20 °C and - 80 °C showed no significant changes in the stability, and also no substantial changes in MAP viability were found using phage amplification assay. The prepared MAP quantification standard provided homogeneous and reproducible results demonstrating its suitability for utilisation as an international reference qPCR standard.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.