Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34078950›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Study on the prognosis predictive model of COVID-19 patients based on CT radiomics.

Dandan Wang, Chencui Huang, Siyu Bao, Tingting Fan, Zhongqi Sun, Yiqiao Wang, Huijie Jiang, Song Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. CT-based radiomics nomogram for distinguishingTranslational pediatrics · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Dandan WangDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, 246 Xuefu Road, Harbin, Heilongjiang Province, China.
Chencui HuangDepartment of Research Collaboration, R&D center, Beijing Deepwise & League of PHD Technology Co., Ltd, Beijing, China.
Siyu BaoDepartment of Research Collaboration, R&D center, Beijing Deepwise & League of PHD Technology Co., Ltd, Beijing, China.
Tingting FanDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, 246 Xuefu Road, Harbin, Heilongjiang Province, China.
Zhongqi SunDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, 246 Xuefu Road, Harbin, Heilongjiang Province, China.
Yiqiao WangDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, 246 Xuefu Road, Harbin, Heilongjiang Province, China.
Huijie JiangDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, 246 Xuefu Road, Harbin, Heilongjiang Province, China. jianghuijie@hrbmu.edu.cn.
Song WangDepartment of Radiology, Longhua Hospital,, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No.725, South Wanping Road, Shanghai, 200032, China. songwangws@163.com.

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China 2019YFC0118100National Natural Science Foundation of China 81873910
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Making timely assessments of disease progression in patients with COVID-19 could help offer the best personalized treatment. The purpose of this study was to explore an effective model to predict the outcome of patients with COVID-19. We retrospectively included 188 patients (124 in the training set and 64 in the test set) diagnosed with COVID-19. Patients were divided into aggravation and improvement groups according to the disease progression. Three kinds of models were established, including the radiomics, clinical, and combined model. Receiver operating characteristic curves, decision curves, and Delong's test were used to evaluate and compare the models. Our analysis showed that all the established prediction models had good predictive performance in predicting the progress and outcome of COVID-19.

Indexed as

Tomography, X-Ray ComputedAgedCOVID-19Diagnosis, Computer-AssistedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedModels, TheoreticalPrognosisROC Curve

Identifiers

PMID34078950
PMCPMC8172890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.