Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34078928›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

A generalized deep learning framework for whole-slide image segmentation and analysis.

Mahendra Khened, Avinash Kori, Haran Rajkumar, Ganapathy Krishnamurthi, Balaji Srinivasan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 84 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
84citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

84 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Integrating Spatial Proteogenomics in Cancer Research.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Digital neuropathology of neurodegenerative disorders: Foundations, research advances, and future directions.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Review
  20. Article

24 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mahendra Khened *Department of Engineering Design, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, 600036, India.
Avinash Kori *Department of Engineering Design, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, 600036, India.
Haran Rajkumar *Department of Engineering Design, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, 600036, India.
Ganapathy KrishnamurthiDepartment of Engineering Design, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, 600036, India. gankrish@iitm.ac.in.
Balaji SrinivasanDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, 600036, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Histopathology tissue analysis is considered the gold standard in cancer diagnosis and prognosis. Whole-slide imaging (WSI), i.e., the scanning and digitization of entire histology slides, are now being adopted across the world in pathology labs. Trained histopathologists can provide an accurate diagnosis of biopsy specimens based on WSI data. Given the dimensionality of WSIs and the increase in the number of potential cancer cases, analyzing these images is a time-consuming process. Automated segmentation of tumorous tissue helps in elevating the precision, speed, and reproducibility of research. In the recent past, deep learning-based techniques have provided state-of-the-art results in a wide variety of image analysis tasks, including the analysis of digitized slides. However, deep learning-based solutions pose many technical challenges, including the large size of WSI data, heterogeneity in images, and complexity of features. In this study, we propose a generalized deep learning-based framework for histopathology tissue analysis to address these challenges. Our framework is, in essence, a sequence of individual techniques in the preprocessing-training-inference pipeline which, in conjunction, improve the efficiency and the generalizability of the analysis. The combination of techniques we have introduced includes an ensemble segmentation model, division of the WSI into smaller overlapping patches while addressing class imbalances, efficient techniques for inference, and an efficient, patch-based uncertainty estimation framework. Our ensemble consists of DenseNet-121, Inception-ResNet-V2, and DeeplabV3Plus, where all the networks were trained end to end for every task. We demonstrate the efficacy and improved generalizability of our framework by evaluating it on a variety of histopathology tasks including breast cancer metastases (CAMELYON), colon cancer (DigestPath), and liver cancer (PAIP). Our proposed framework has state-of-the-art performance across all these tasks and is ranked within the top 5 currently for the challenges based on these datasets. The entire framework along with the trained models and the related documentation are made freely available at GitHub and PyPi. Our framework is expected to aid histopathologists in accurate and efficient initial diagnosis. Moreover, the estimated uncertainty maps will help clinicians to make informed decisions and further treatment planning or analysis.

Identifiers

PMID34078928
PMCPMC8172839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.