ArticleSaudi medical journal2021
Validation and clinical application of the Arabic rhinoplasty outcomes evaluation questionnaire.
Article in Saudi medical journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07317947 (The Effect of Lateral Crural Steal With Columellar Strut Graft on Nasal Tip Projection and Rotation in Primary Open Rhinoplasty), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Effect of Lateral Crural Steal With Columellar Strut Graft on Nasal Tip Projection and Rotation in Primary Open Rhinoplasty
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Validation and Comparative Assessment of Patient Satisfaction and Quality of Life Questionnaires Among Indonesian Nasal Fracture Patients Post-rhinoplasty.Indian journal of plastic surgery : official publication of the Association of Plastic Surgeons of India · 2026Article
- Cross-cultural adaptation, validation, and arabic translation of the rhinoplasty outcome evaluation.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Patient Satisfaction With Rhinoplasty and Influencing Factors; Using the Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation Questionnaire: A Cross-Sectional Study in Iran.Health science reports · 2025Article
- Saddle Nose Deformity Reconstruction in Yemen: A Prospective Study of the Diced Cartilage Fascia Technique.Cureus · 2025Article
- Normative Values of Rhinology Questionnaires in Young Adults: A Tool to Identify Candidates for Rhinoplasty.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Development and Validation of the Rhinoplasty Outcomes Evaluation (ROE) Questionnaire: An Analytical Study.World journal of plastic surgery · 2022Article
- Triamcinolone acetonide for aesthetic refinement in rhinoplasty for patients with thick skin: the FAN technique ‒ a pilot study.Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo carry out translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and validation of the rhinoplasty outcome evaluation (ROE) into Arabic.
methodsThis non-randomized, prospective study included 50 patients from the Otorhinolaryngology Department, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia who underwent primary rhinoplasty from January to October 2020 and a control group of 89 healthy individuals. The reliability of the Arabic (ROE) was tested using Cronbach's alpha. The test-retest reliability was assessed by estimating the intra-class correlation coefficient for the total Arabic (ROE) score and individual items. Discriminant validity was used to examine the validity of the Arabic (ROE) by comparing the scores of the patients and the control group. The Friedman test was used to measure differences in Arabic (ROE) ratings within the study patients' group, including preoperative, and 2 weeks, and 3 months postoperative ratings.
resultsThe internal consistency and reliability of the Arabic (ROE) were good. There was a significant difference in ratings between rhinoplasty patients and the control group regarding both the individual questions and total scores. Significant improvement was observed in the patient group ratings at 2 weeks and 3 months postoperatively compared to the preoperative rating (
conclusionsThe Arabic version of the (ROE) showed good reliability and validity and can be used in the assessment of rhinoplasty outcomes in the Arabic population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.