Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34078728›Full record

ArticleSaudi medical journal2021

Validation and clinical application of the Arabic rhinoplasty outcomes evaluation questionnaire.

Dhaifallah S Mulafikh, Sami E Alharethy, Almaha A Alqabbani, Tamer A Mesallam

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Saudi medical journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07317947 (The Effect of Lateral Crural Steal With Columellar Strut Graft on Nasal Tip Projection and Rotation in Primary Open Rhinoplasty), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07317947 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Lateral Crural Steal With Columellar Strut Graft on Nasal Tip Projection and Rotation in Primary Open Rhinoplasty

TypeinterventionalSponsorKafrelsheikh UniversityRan2026 to 2027Enrolled22ConditionsRhinoplasty, Nasal Surgery, Aesthetic OutcomesArmsLateral crural steal with columellar strut graft in Primary Open Rhinoplasty
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Validation and Comparative Assessment of Patient Satisfaction and Quality of Life Questionnaires Among Indonesian Nasal Fracture Patients Post-rhinoplasty.Indian journal of plastic surgery : official publication of the Association of Plastic Surgeons of India · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dhaifallah S MulafikhFrom the Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (Mulafikh, Alharethy, Alqabbani), College of Medicine and from the Research Chair of Voice, Communications, and Swallowing Disorders, Otolaryngology Department (Mesallam), King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Sami E AlharethyFrom the Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (Mulafikh, Alharethy, Alqabbani), College of Medicine and from the Research Chair of Voice, Communications, and Swallowing Disorders, Otolaryngology Department (Mesallam), King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Almaha A AlqabbaniFrom the Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (Mulafikh, Alharethy, Alqabbani), College of Medicine and from the Research Chair of Voice, Communications, and Swallowing Disorders, Otolaryngology Department (Mesallam), King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Tamer A MesallamFrom the Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (Mulafikh, Alharethy, Alqabbani), College of Medicine and from the Research Chair of Voice, Communications, and Swallowing Disorders, Otolaryngology Department (Mesallam), King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Imam Mohammad ibn Saud Islamic University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo carry out translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and validation of the rhinoplasty outcome evaluation (ROE) into Arabic.

methodsThis non-randomized, prospective study included 50 patients from the Otorhinolaryngology Department, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia who underwent primary rhinoplasty from January to October 2020 and a control group of 89 healthy individuals. The reliability of the Arabic (ROE) was tested using Cronbach's alpha. The test-retest reliability was assessed by estimating the intra-class correlation coefficient for the total Arabic (ROE) score and individual items. Discriminant validity was used to examine the validity of the Arabic (ROE) by comparing the scores of the patients and the control group. The Friedman test was used to measure differences in Arabic (ROE) ratings within the study patients' group, including preoperative, and 2 weeks, and 3 months postoperative ratings.

resultsThe internal consistency and reliability of the Arabic (ROE) were good. There was a significant difference in ratings between rhinoplasty patients and the control group regarding both the individual questions and total scores. Significant improvement was observed in the patient group ratings at 2 weeks and 3 months postoperatively compared to the preoperative rating (

conclusionsThe Arabic version of the (ROE) showed good reliability and validity and can be used in the assessment of rhinoplasty outcomes in the Arabic population.

Indexed as

RhinoplastyHumansProspective StudiesReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesTranslationsArabicpatient satisfactionpatient selectionquality of liferhinoplastyrhinoplasty outcomes evaluation

Identifiers

PMID34078728
PMCPMC9149721
OpenAlexW3164608002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.