ArticleBMJ open2021
Proton therapy for craniopharyngioma in adults: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of proton therapy and photon therapy for patients with craniopharyngioma: a systematic review and meta‑analysis.Pituitary · 2025Pooled it
- Radiotherapeutic Strategies and Advances in the Management of Pituitary Adenomas.Neuroendocrinology · 2026Review
- Resection of craniopharyngiomas: comparison between gross total resection and subtotal resection with adjuvant radiation.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2025Review
- Endocrine outcomes after limited surgery and conformal photon radiation therapy for pediatric craniopharyngioma: Long-term results from the RT1 protocol.Neuro-oncology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionCraniopharyngioma is the most challenging to treat brain tumour with high recurrence rates, which can be effectively reduced by adjuvant radiotherapy. In recent years, proton therapy (PT), with its physical properties of heavy ion beam, that is, Prague peak phenomenon, has been more frequently used in patients with craniopharyngioma. Compared with conventional X-ray beam radiotherapy, PT can reduce the damage to normal tissues and enlarge the damage to tumours. Some studies have shown that PT has advantages in the treatment of craniopharyngioma in adults. However, the optimal management of craniopharyngioma remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PT for craniopharyngioma in adults. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will search six databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, Amed, Scopus), clinical research registration websites and grey literature, aiming to identify randomised controlled trials (RCTs) on PT for craniopharyngioma in adults between 1 January 1954 and 28 September 2021. In the RCTs, PT will be used as the intervention group, and conventional X-ray beam radiotherapy will be used as the comparator group. Tumour recurrence and survival will be the primary outcome, and treatment-related toxicity will be the secondary outcome. The study selection, data extraction, bias risk and quality evaluation will be operated by two to four researchers independently. We will use Review Manager V.5.2 (RevMan V.5.2) for data analysis. If there is significant heterogeneity, we will identify the source of heterogeneity by subgroup analysis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Our study is based on existing RCTs and does not require ethical approval. The results of the study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal or at a related conference. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020200909.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.