Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34078396›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity2021

Sociodemographic differences in motives for food selection: results from the LoCard cross-sectional survey.

Hanna Konttinen, Otto Halmesvaara, Mikael Fogelholm, Hannu Saarijärvi, Jaakko Nevalainen, Maijaliisa Erkkola

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
11.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 96 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Rye (Frontiers in nutrition · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hanna KonttinenFaculty of Social Sciences, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 18, Helsinki, 00014, Finland. hanna.konttinen@helsinki.fi.ORCID 0000-0002-6001-4418
Otto HalmesvaaraFaculty of Social Sciences, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 18, Helsinki, 00014, Finland.
Mikael FogelholmDepartment of Food and Nutrition, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 66, Helsinki, 00014, Finland.
Hannu SaarijärviFaculty of Management and Business, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Jaakko NevalainenFaculty of Social Sciences (Health Sciences), Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Maijaliisa ErkkolaDepartment of Food and Nutrition, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 66, Helsinki, 00014, Finland.
University of Helsinki · FITampere University · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough sociodemographic differences in dietary intake have been widely studied, the up-to-date evidence on the corresponding variations in motives for food selection is limited. We investigated how sociodemographic characteristics and special diets in households are associated with the relative importance of various food motives.

methodsParticipants were members of the S Group loyalty card program across Finland who consented to release their grocery purchase data to be used for research purposes and responded to a web-based questionnaire in 2018 (LoCard study). Self-reported information on sociodemographic factors (age, gender, marital status, living situation, education, household income), special diets in household and food motives (Food Choice Questionnaire) were utilized in the present analyses (N = 10,795). Age- and gender-adjusted linear models were performed separately for each sociodemographic predictor and motive dimension (derived by factor analysis) outcome. The importance of each sociodemographic predictor was evaluated based on an increase in R

resultsAge emerged as a central determinant of food motives with the following strongest associations: young adults emphasized convenience (∆R

conclusionsWe observed sociodemographic differences in a range of food motives that might act as barriers or drivers for adopting diets that benefit human and planetary health. Interventions aiming to narrow SEP and gender disparities in dietary intake should employ strategies that take into account higher priority of familiarity and price in daily food selection in lower-SEP individuals and males.

Indexed as

Diet SurveysFood PreferencesAdultAgedConsumer BehaviorCross-Sectional StudiesDietFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSociological FactorsYoung AdultAgeDisparitiesEating behaviourFood choice questionnaireGenderMotivesPriceSocioeconomic statusVegetarian diet

Identifiers

PMID34078396
PMCPMC8173871
OpenAlexW3164783995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.