Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34078394›Full record

ArticleVirology journal2021

Resource-efficient internally controlled in-house real-time PCR detection of SARS-CoV-2.

Janine Michel, Markus Neumann, Eva Krause, Thomas Rinner, Therese Muzeniek, Marica Grossegesse, Georg Hille, Franziska Schwarz, Andreas Puyskens, Sophie Förster and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Virology journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Comparative Analysis ofDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Evaluation of 11 commercially available PCR kits for the detection of monkeypox virus DNA, Berlin, July to September 2022.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Janine MichelCentre for Biological Threats and Special Pathogens, Highly Pathogenic Viruses (ZBS 1), Robert Koch Institute, Seestraße 10, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
Markus NeumannCentre for Biological Threats and Special Pathogens, Highly Pathogenic Viruses (ZBS 1), Robert Koch Institute, Seestraße 10, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
Eva KrauseCentre for Biological Threats and Special Pathogens, Highly Pathogenic Viruses (ZBS 1), Robert Koch Institute, Seestraße 10, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
Thomas RinnerCentre for Biological Threats and Special Pathogens, Highly Pathogenic Viruses (ZBS 1), Robert Koch Institute, Seestraße 10, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
Therese MuzeniekCentre for Biological Threats and Special Pathogens, Highly Pathogenic Viruses (ZBS 1), Robert Koch Institute, Seestraße 10, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
Marica GrossegesseCentre for Biological Threats and Special Pathogens, Highly Pathogenic Viruses (ZBS 1), Robert Koch Institute, Seestraße 10, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
Georg HilleCentre for Biological Threats and Special Pathogens, Highly Pathogenic Viruses (ZBS 1), Robert Koch Institute, Seestraße 10, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
Franziska SchwarzCentre for Biological Threats and Special Pathogens, Highly Pathogenic Viruses (ZBS 1), Robert Koch Institute, Seestraße 10, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
Andreas PuyskensCentre for Biological Threats and Special Pathogens, Highly Pathogenic Viruses (ZBS 1), Robert Koch Institute, Seestraße 10, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
Sophie FörsterCentre for Biological Threats and Special Pathogens, Highly Pathogenic Viruses (ZBS 1), Robert Koch Institute, Seestraße 10, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
Barbara BiereInfluenza and Other Respiratory Viruses (FG 17), Robert Koch Institute, Seestraße 10, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
Daniel BourquainCentre for Biological Threats and Special Pathogens, Highly Pathogenic Viruses (ZBS 1), Robert Koch Institute, Seestraße 10, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
Cristina DomingoCentre for Biological Threats and Special Pathogens, Highly Pathogenic Viruses (ZBS 1), Robert Koch Institute, Seestraße 10, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
Annika BrinkmannCentre for Biological Threats and Special Pathogens, Highly Pathogenic Viruses (ZBS 1), Robert Koch Institute, Seestraße 10, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
Lars SchaadeCentre for Biological Threats and Special Pathogens, Highly Pathogenic Viruses (ZBS 1), Robert Koch Institute, Seestraße 10, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
Livia SchrickCentre for Biological Threats and Special Pathogens, Highly Pathogenic Viruses (ZBS 1), Robert Koch Institute, Seestraße 10, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
Andreas NitscheCentre for Biological Threats and Special Pathogens, Highly Pathogenic Viruses (ZBS 1), Robert Koch Institute, Seestraße 10, 13353, Berlin, Germany. NitscheA@rki.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8185-3176

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe reliable detection of SARS-CoV-2 has become one of the most important contributions to COVID-19 crisis management. With the publication of the first sequences of SARS-CoV-2, several diagnostic PCR assays have been developed and published. In addition to in-house assays the market was flooded with numerous commercially available ready-to-use PCR kits, with both approaches showing alarming shortages in reagent supply.

aimHere we present a resource-efficient in-house protocol for the PCR detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in patient specimens (RKI/ZBS1 SARS-CoV-2 protocol).

methodsTwo duplex one-step real-time RT-PCR assays are run simultaneously and provide information on two different SARS-CoV-2 genomic regions. Each one is duplexed with a control that either indicates potential PCR inhibition or proves the successful extraction of nucleic acid from the clinical specimen.

resultsLimit of RNA detection for both SARS-CoV-2 assays is below 10 genomes per reaction. The protocol enables testing specimens in duplicate across the two different SARS-CoV-2 PCR assays, saving reagents by increasing testing capacity. The protocol can be run on various PCR cyclers with several PCR master mix kits.

conclusionThe presented RKI/ZBS1 SARS-CoV-2 protocol represents a cost-effective alternative in times of shortages when commercially available ready-to-use kits may not be available or affordable.

Indexed as

Coronavirus Envelope ProteinsCOVID-19COVID-19 Nucleic Acid TestingHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansLimit of DetectionPolyproteinsReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionRNA, ViralSARS-CoV-2Sensitivity and SpecificityViral ProteinsCoronavirus Envelope Proteinsenvelope protein, SARS-CoV-2ORF1ab polyprotein, SARS-CoV-2PolyproteinsRNA, ViralViral ProteinsCOVID-19DiagnosticsInternal controlReal-time PCRSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID34078394
PMCPMC8170437

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.