ArticleBMC public health2021
Incidence and risk factors of congenital heart disease in Qingdao: a prospective cohort study.
Article in BMC public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06158373 (The Effect of Mother's Massage and Safe Swaddling on Bonding, Self-effıcacy and Vital Signs in Infants Undergoing Cardiovascular Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Effect of Mother's Massage and Safe Swaddling on Bonding, Self-effıcacy and Vital Signs in Infants Undergoing Cardiovascular Surgery
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prevalence, Clinical Profile, and Factors Associated With Congenital Heart Disease in Children Diagnosed at National Referral Hospital, Bhutan: A Cross-Sectional Study.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Maternal Cardiac Disease and Congenital Heart Disease Risk in Offspring.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Incidence and predictors of mortality among neonates with congenital heart disease in Ethiopia: a retrospective cohort study.BMC pediatrics · 2024Article
- Epidemiology of Congenital Heart Defects in Perinatal Infants in Guangxi, China.International journal of general medicine · 2024Article
- Identifying the Factors Affecting the Incidence of Congenital Heart Disease Using Support Vector Machine and Particle Swarm Optimization.Advanced biomedical research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMany studies have been conducted to assess the incidence of congenital heart disease (CHD). However, results were greatly inconsistent among these studies with a broad range of findings.
methodsA prospective census-based cohort study was conducted in Qingdao, China, from August 1, 2018 to April 30, 2019. All of the local registered pregnant women were continuously investigated and followed from 15 to 20 weeks of gestation to delivery, tracking the CHD cases in both the fetal and neonatal stages. A logistic regression model was applied to assess the association between CHD and possible risk factors.
resultsThe positive rate of prenatal CHD screening was 14.36 per 1000 fetuses and the incidence of CHD was 9.38 per 1000 live births. Results from logistic regression indicated that, living in the countryside (odds ratio, (OR): 0.771; 95% confidence interval, (CI): 0.628-0.946) and having a childbearing history (OR: 0.802; 95%CI: 0.676-0.951) were negatively associated with CHD. However, twin pregnancy (OR: 1.957, 95% CI: 1.245-3.076), illness in the first trimester (OR: 1.306; 95% CI: 1.048-1.628), a family history of CHD (OR: 7.156; 95% CI: 3.293-15.552), and having a child with a birth defect (OR: 2.086; 95% CI: 1.167-3.731) were positively associated with CHD.
conclusionCHD is a serious health problem in Qingdao. The CHD incidence found in this study was similar to existing research. The positive rate of prenatal CHD screening was higher than the incidence of neonatal CHD. Moreover, CHD risk factors were identified in our study, and our findings may have great implications for formation CHD intervention strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.