Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34078332›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2021

Interfaces of occupational health management and corporate social responsibility: a multi-centre qualitative study from Germany.

Eva Kuhn, Sebastian Müller, Christoph Teusch, Grit Tanner, Marlies Schümann, Carolin Baur, Eva Bamberg, Ludger Heidbrink, Stuart McLennan, Alena Buyx

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Eva KuhnInstitute of History and Ethics in Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany. eva.kuhn@tum.de.ORCID 0000-0002-8337-9639
Sebastian MüllerChair of Practical Philosophy, Kiel University, Leibnizstr. 4, 24118, Kiel, Germany.
Christoph TeuschDie VERBRAUCHER INITIATIVE e.V. (Bundesverband), Berliner Allee 105, 13088, Berlin, Germany.
Grit TannerDepartment of Work and Organizational Psychology, Beuth University of Applied Sciences Berlin, Lütticher Straße 38, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
Marlies SchümannDepartment of Work and Organizational Psychology, Beuth University of Applied Sciences Berlin, Lütticher Straße 38, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
Carolin BaurLeadership Excellence Institute Zeppelin, Zeppelin University, Am Seemooser Horn 20, 88045, Friedrichshafen, Germany.
Eva BambergWork and Organizational Psychology, University of Hamburg, Von-Melle-Park 5, 20146, Hamburg, Germany.
Ludger HeidbrinkChair of Practical Philosophy, Kiel University, Leibnizstr. 4, 24118, Kiel, Germany.
Stuart McLennan *Institute of History and Ethics in Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Alena Buyx *Institute of History and Ethics in Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Berliner Hochschule für Technik · DEChristian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel · DETechnical University of Munich · DEUniversität Hamburg · DEUniversity of Basel · CHZeppelin Universität gemeinnützige GmbH · DE

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 02L14A041
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe workplace has been identified as a priority setting for health promotion. There are potential advantages of systematically integrating Occupational Health Management (OHM) and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). However, OHM and CSR are usually overseen by different management branches with different sets of values, and there is a lack of empirical research regarding interfaces between OHM and CSR. Germany offers a particularly useful setting due to legislation requiring health to be promoted in the workplace. This study aims to examine key stakeholders' views and experiences regarding interfaces between OHM and CSR in German companies.

methodsIndividual semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with a sample of 77 German stakeholders from three different groups: experts in occupational health and corporate social responsibility from various companies (n = 35), business partners (n = 19), and various non-business partners (n = 23). Transcripts were analysed using qualitative content analysis.

resultsParticipants identified several areas in which OHM and CSR are already interacting at strategic, structural and cultural levels, but also highlighted several barriers that undermine a more meaningful interaction. Participants reported difficulties in articulating the underlying ethical values relevant to both OHM and CSR at the strategic level. Several structural barriers were also highlighted, including a lack of resources (both financial and knowledge), and OHM and CSR departments not being fully developed or undertaken at entirely different operational levels. Finally, the missing practical implementation of corporate philosophy was identified as a critical cultural barrier to interfaces between OHM and CSR, with existing guidelines and companies' philosophies that already connect OHM and CSR not being embraced by employees and managers.

conclusionsThere is already significant overlap in the focus of OHM and CSR, at the structural, strategic and cultural levels in many German companies. The potential is there, both in theory and practice, for the systematic combination of OHM and CSR. The insights from this study will be useful to ensure that closer integration between both management branches is set up in a socially sustainable and ethical manner.

Indexed as

Occupational HealthGermanyHumansOrganizationsSocial ResponsibilityWorkplaceCompany cultureCorporate philosophyEthical valuesGermanyWorkplace health promotion

Identifiers

PMID34078332
PMCPMC8173898
OpenAlexW3161747294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.