Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34078317›Full record

Trial reportBMC cancer2021

A clinical study of pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony stimulating factor (PEG-rhG-CSF) in preventing neutropenia during concurrent chemoradiotherapy of cervical cancer.

Dongling Zou, Mingfang Guo, Qi Zhou

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04542356 (Efficacy and Safety of PEGylated Recombinant Human Granulocyte Stimulating Factor in the Prevention of Neutropenia During Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Cervical Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04542356 phase2completednot on this map

Efficacy and Safety of PEGylated Recombinant Human Granulocyte Stimulating Factor in the Prevention of Neutropenia During Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Cervical Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorChongqing University Cancer HospitalRan2018 to 2021Enrolled60ConditionsCervical CancerArmsPEG-rhG-CSF, rhG-CSF
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dongling ZouChongqing University Cancer Hospital, Shapingba district, Chongqing, 400030, China.
Mingfang GuoChongqing University Cancer Hospital, Shapingba district, Chongqing, 400030, China.
Qi ZhouChongqing University Cancer Hospital, Shapingba district, Chongqing, 400030, China. cqzl_zq@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0441-584X
Chongqing University · CN

Funding

the CSCO-Qilu cancer research fund project Y-Q201801-066the Science and Technology Research Program of Chongqing Municipal Education Commission KJQN201900106
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the effectiveness and safety of pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony stimulating factor (PEG-rhG-CSF) in preventing neutropenia during chemoradiotherapy in patients with cervical cancer.

methodsFrom August 2018 to April 2020, 60 patients who were pathologically confirmed as cervical cancer were randomly divided into two groups at a ratio of 2:1: PEG-modified-rhG-CSF experimental group and control group. The primary endpoints were the incidence of grade 3-4 neutropenia. Secondary endpoints included the duration of grade 3-4 neutropenia, the incidence of grade 4 neutropenia, the incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN), delay rate of chemotherapy, prolonged time of chemotherapy, time to complete radiotherapy and safety.

resultsThe incidence of grade 3-4 neutropenia in the experimental group was significantly lower than the control group (10% vs. 77.78%, P < 0.001). However, there was no statistical significance between the two groups in the duration of grade 3-4 neutropenia (3.75 days vs. 5.07 days, P = 0.871). The experimental group was better than the control group in the incidence of grade 4 neutropenia, the incidence of FN and delay rate of chemotherapy, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Besides, the prolonged time of chemotherapy and the time to complete radiotherapy in the experimental group were less than those in the control group, but the difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). The incidence of adverse events in the experimental group and control group were 55.00 and 94.44%, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (P = 0.003).

conclusionPEG-rhG-CSF preventive treatment used in the course of chemoradiotherapy for patients with cervical cancer can reduce the incidence of neutropenia and improve the incidence of delayed chemotherapy cycles.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov , NCT04542356 . Registered 9 September 2020 - Retrospectively registered.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarcinoma, Squamous CellChemoradiotherapyCisplatinFemaleGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactorHumansIncidenceInjections, SubcutaneousMiddle AgedNeutropeniaPaclitaxelPolyethylene GlycolsCisplatinGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactorPaclitaxelpegylated granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, humanPolyethylene GlycolsCervical CancerConcurrent RadiochemotherapyNeutropeniaPegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony stimulating factor

Identifiers

PMID34078317
PMCPMC8173964
OpenAlexW3164124115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.