ArticleBMC psychiatry2021
Family involvement practices for persons with psychotic disorders in community mental health centres - a cross-sectional fidelity-based study.
Article in BMC psychiatry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03869177 (Implementation of Guidelines on Family Involvement for Persons With Psychotic Disorders in Community Mental Health Centres. A Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial.), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Implementation of Guidelines on Family Involvement for Persons With Psychotic Disorders in Community Mental Health Centres. A Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.
- Next of kin involvement in mental health care services - a systematic participatory overview of evidence syntheses.BMC psychiatry · 2026Pooled it
- Effectiveness of implementing family involvement on patient outcomes in individuals with psychotic disorders: a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial.BMC psychiatry · 2025Trial
- Implementation of Guidelines on Family Involvement for Persons with Psychotic Disorders (IFIP): A Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial.Administration and policy in mental health · 2023Trial
- Barriers and facilitators when implementing family involvement for persons with psychotic disorders in community mental health centres - a nested qualitative study.BMC health services research · 2022Trial
- Family psychoeducation to support patients with psychotic illness: two-year outcomes from a pre-post longitudinal pilot study.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- "Where are we on the Road Towards Family-focused Practice in Mental Healthcare?" - Perspectives from a Swedish/Norwegian Research Collaborative.Community mental health journal · 2026Article
- Impact of introducing a capacity-based mental health law in Norway: qualitative exploration of multi-stakeholder perspectives.BJPsych open · 2025Article
- Measuring the level of implementation of advance care planning - a fidelity-based cross-sectional study.Frontiers in health services · 2025Article
- The TIPS family psychoeducational group work approach in first episode psychosis and related disorders: 25 years of experiences.Early intervention in psychiatry · 2025Article
- Implementation of guidelines on Family Involvement for persons with Psychotic disorders: a pragmatic cluster randomized trial. Effect on relatives' outcomes and family interventions received.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2024Article
- Family Caregivers' Trajectories of Distress While Caring for a Person With Serious Mental Illness.Qualitative health research · 2024Article
- Long term outcomes and causal modelling of compulsory inpatient and outpatient mental health care using Norwegian registry data: Protocol for a controversies in psychiatry research project.International journal of methods in psychiatric research · 2023Article
- A Proxy Approach to Family Involvement and Neurocognitive Function in First Episode of Non-Affective Psychosis: Sex-Related Differences.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Capacity-based legislation in Norway has so far scarcely influenced the daily life and responsibilities of patients' carers: a qualitative study.BMC psychiatry · 2023Article
- "The most important thing is that those closest to you, understand you": a nested qualitative study of persons with psychotic disorders' experiences with family involvement.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2023Article
- Clinicians' perceptions of family involvement in the treatment of persons with psychotic disorders: a nested qualitative study.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2023Article
- The Lived Experiences of Family Members and Carers of People with Psychosis: A Bottom-Up Review Co-Written by Experts by Experience and Academics.Psychopathology · 2023Review
- The duty of confidentiality during family involvement: ethical challenges and possible solutions in the treatment of persons with psychotic disorders.BMC psychiatry · 2022Article
- Associations between personal recovery and service user-rated versus clinician-rated clinical recovery, a cross-sectional study.BMC psychiatry · 2022Article
- Barriers to WHO Mental Health Action Plan updates to expand family and caregiver involvement in mental healthcare.General psychiatry · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFamily involvement for persons with psychotic disorders is supported by scientific evidence, as well as legal and ethical considerations, and recommended in clinical practice guidelines. This article reports a cross-sectional measurement of the level of implementation of such guidelines in fifteen community mental health centre units in Norway, and presents a novel fidelity scale to measure basic family involvement and support. The aim was to investigate current family involvement practices comprehensively, as a basis for targeted quality improvement.
methodsWe employed three fidelity scales, with 12-14 items, to measure family involvement practices. Items were scored from 1 to 5, where 1 equals no implementation and 5 equals full implementation. Data was analysed using descriptive statistics, a non-parametric test, and calculation of interrater reliability for the scales.
resultsThe mean score was 2.33 on the fidelity scale measuring basic family involvement and support. Among patients with psychotic disorders, only 4% had received family psychoeducation. On the family psychoeducation fidelity assessment scale, measuring practice and content, the mean score was 2.78. Among the eight units who offered family psychoeducation, it was 4.34. On the general organizational index scale, measuring the organisation and implementation of family psychoeducation, the mean score was 1.78. Among the units who offered family psychoeducation, it was 2.46. As a measure of interrater reliability, the intra-class correlation coefficient was 0.99 for the basic family involvement and support scale, 0.93 for the family psychoeducation fidelity assessment scale and 0.96 for the general organizational index scale.
conclusionsThe implementation level of the national guidelines on family involvement for persons with psychotic disorders was generally poor. The quality of family psychoeducation was high, but few patients had received this evidence-based treatment. Our novel fidelity scale shows promising psychometric properties and may prove a useful tool to improve the quality of health services. There is a need to increase the implementation of family involvement practices in Norway, to reach a larger percentage of patients and relatives.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT03869177 . Registered 11.03.19.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.